Skip to content
Subscribe

Michelle Obama blames lack of comprehensive immigration reform on Republicans

Published:

Recently speaking before a key Hispanic audience through the Spanish television network Univision, The Hill newspaper blog reports that First Lady Michelle Obama placed blame for her husband's inability to pass immigration reform on the Republican Party, saying that legislation like the DREAM Act has been a top item on her husband's agenda.  She is calling on the Hispanic community to hold Republicans accountable for their current immigration stance.

"So I urge the Latino community, he needs help, he's got to have Republicans and Democrats in Congress who are going to step up [...]. If a sound immigration bill gets put on the President's desk, he is going to sign it. But it's got to get through Congress. He can't do it alone," the First Lady said regarding her husband according to The Hill.

While the timing of the First Lady's remarks on the immigration issue may seem a bit of an oddity in the midst of current budget talks on Capitol Hill, they come just as a recent poll indicates that immigration reform is back at the top of the legislative priority of Hispanic voters sampled in the survey.

The venue of her remarks isn't certainly out of place either for obvious reasons. Not only would much of the Univision audience be the most emotionally connected to the issue, but the grassroots community that supported the Dream Act was active in organizing demonstrations across the nation.

However, as long as the misconception continues to be passed on to the Hispanic community that Republicans are mainly responsible for the Dream Act's mighty fall, this leaves yet another occasion for laying out the facts on the issue.

Near the beginning of his presidency, President Obama promised that by the end of his first year in office that he would have a comprehensive immigration reform bill. While political promises come with the invisible asterisked disclaimer that they aren't always meant to be kept, such broken promises risk the erosion of the constituency's support to whom they're promised. The president carries this very risk with him in his relationship with the Hispanic community.

Despite the priority that Mr. and Mrs. Obama claim that he placed on comprehensive immigration reform, legislation was brought to the floor after the Affordable Care Act in 2010 and in the very last moments of the 111th lame duck congressional session.

Even in the lame duck session of Congress, Democrats still retained a majority in both Houses of Congress and fell six Democratic votes short of passing the Dream Act. To be fair to the President, he did sue the state of Arizona over its controversial immigration law that empowered local law enforcement officials to check the immigration status of suspected individuals.  However, the failure to rally his party's majority in the Senate will continue to haunt President Obama throughout the rest of his term, especially as more states are considering an Arizona-style immigration law.

There's also the notion that he's sending mixed messages to the Hispanic community, calling for the passing of comprehensive immigration reform that won't separate families. Simultaneously, enforcement has toughened under Obama, at both local businesses and along the border.

The administration's delay on immigration reform has bought time for more local communities, like Republican-leaning cities here in California and other numerous states as a whole, to take enforcement procedures into their own hands. In essence, states' recent approaches are providing the testing grounds for whether enforcing existing laws are more effective than comprehensive reform.

If the President desires the typically loyal Hispanic constituency to take him seriously on his talk about immigration reform, it would be a good idea if he elucidated his currently convoluted stance and actions on the issue.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Michelle Obama blames lack of comprehensive immigration reform on Republicans

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us