President Obama breaks emergency war spending pledge

image
Published: 24 May, 2010
1 min read

Following in the footsteps of George W. Bush, President Obama has requested another $33 billion of "emergency", off-budget spending on the Afghanistan and Iraq Wars. 

As a presidential candidate, Obama often criticized President Bush's chronic use of supplemental war spending bills, which added to the national debt.  In February 2009, President Obama told Congress, "For seven years, we have been a nation at war.  We will no longer hide its price."  In April 2009, Obama requested tens of billions more in supplemental funding for the wars, but wrote House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, "This is the last planned war supplemental."

Republicans and Democrats are haggling over how to pay for the off-budget war spending increase, but the bill is likely to pass as US troops continue operations in both war theaters.

Much like Obama's failed promise to shut down Guantanamo Bay in one year, his pledge to end supplemental war spending bills, which further exacerbate the budget deficit and national debt, has been broken. 

When it comes to war policy, it would appear that Obama's record spending, preservation of the status quo on civil liberties, and expansion of the War on Terror into Pakistan and Yemen make it difficult to distinguish his platform from that of his much-maligned predecessor.

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read