Lawsuit challenges detainment of illegal immigrants for over six months without a hearing

image
Published: 21 May, 2010
2 min read

A U.S. District Court in Los Angeles is hearing a class-action lawsuit about the federal government's right to detain illegal immigrants for periods longer than six months without bond.



Currently, there are 1,400 immigrant detainees in the Los Angeles area. According to a list released by the U.S. Department of Justice, more than 350 of them have been imprisoned in California facilities for longer than six months while their deportation cases are being settled.



The American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California obtained the list by a federal court order late last month.  Authorities at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement opposed the disclosure, and lawyers from the department continue to fight the ACLU over bond hearings for immigrant detainees.



The ACLU, along with the Stanford Immigrants' Rights Clinic, and the law firm of Sidley and Austin filed the suit. It challenges whether federal officials should detain illegal immigrants, pending the completion of their cases, for more than six months without granting them hearings to be released. As it stands now, there is no limit to the duration an immigrant can be detained while their case is being resolved.



Current regulations provide that only detainees who cannot be deported within six months of their case being concluded are afforded bond hearings.



Director of the immigrants' rights and national security program of the ACLU of Southern California, Ahilan Arulanantham, said that asylum is being sought by many of the class members. He claims that some have been held for years, and around a third have never been represented by an attorney. He divulged to the L.A. Times that lawyers chose the seemingly arbitrary six-month mark based on due process and detention case law.



Customs revamped its rules on detention last year. It is now the policy of immigration officials to release newfound illegals seeking asylum if they can prove their identity, pose no threat to the community, and have a legitimate fear of being harmed if sent home.



The more lenient code is little solace to immigrants stuck behind bars who claim they too are escaping persecution in their homeland.

IVP Donate

You Might Also Like

Trump sitting in the oval office with a piece of paper with a cannabis leaf on his desk.
Is Trump About to Outflank Democrats on Cannabis? Progressives Sound the Alarm
As President Donald Trump signals renewed interest in reclassifying cannabis from a Schedule I drug to Schedule III, a policy goal long championed by liberals and libertarians, the reaction among some partisan progressive advocates is not celebration, but concern....
08 Dec, 2025
-
5 min read
Malibu, California.
From the Palisades to Simi Valley, Independent Voters Poised to Decide the Fight to Replace Jacqui Irwin
The coastline that defines California’s mythology begins here. From Malibu’s winding cliffs to the leafy streets of Brentwood and Bel Air, through Topanga Canyon and into the valleys of Calabasas, Agoura Hills, and Thousand Oaks, the 42nd Assembly District holds some of the most photographed, most coveted, and most challenged terrain in the state. ...
10 Dec, 2025
-
6 min read
Ranked choice voting
Ranked Choice for Every Voter? New Bill Would Transform Every Congressional Election by 2030
As voters brace for what is expected to be a chaotic and divisive midterm election cycle, U.S. Representatives Jamie Raskin (Md.), Don Beyer (Va.), and U.S. Senator Peter Welch (Vt.) have re-introduced legislation that would require ranked choice voting (RCV) for all congressional primaries and general elections beginning in 2030....
10 Dec, 2025
-
3 min read