Derivatives Bubble Concerns State Treasurer

image
Published: 08 Jun, 2009
1 min read

On State Treasurer Robert Lauten’s website he displays the “Act-Independent Statement” to the G-20 Summit in London, APRIL 2, 2009.  This insightful text intends to define the $1.5 Quadrillion derivates bubble, while making common sense recommendations for world leaders.  Derivatives played a key role in the Orange County disaster during the Clinton years.    Regarding the Orange County meltdown, Business Week encouragingly noted in 1994:  “The meltdown also could invite an era of far more intense regulation in both the municipal and derivatives markets--both of which, until now, have largely avoided Washington's gaze.”  Today, it doesn’t appear anyone took that invitation.  Although the very word “derivative” has become taboo, derivatives are quite simply “financial instruments based on other financial instruments – paper based on paper.”  Today terms such as “toxic assets” and “complex securities” are more common.  These include credit default swaps (prominent in the AIG fall), collateralized debt obligations, structured investment vehicles and asset-backed securities.  The solution?  “Virtually all governments should be able to use their emergency economic powers to freeze derivatives...” Perhaps derivatives were illegal between 1936 and 1983 for a reason.  This law was repealed by the Futures Trading Act of 1982. The Bush-Paulson-Obama-Geithner policy to bail out the world derivatives bubble ($10 trillion from the Fed and Treasury) is referred to as a zombie idea.  “Derivatives pose the question of fictitious capital.”


You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read