Super PAC Spending Tops $49 Million in Most Expensive State Judicial Election in History

Super PAC Spending Tops $49 Million in Most Expensive State Judicial Election in History
Photo by Yunus Tug on Unsplash. Unsplash+ license obtained by editor.
Published: 27 Mar, 2025
4 min read

According to Buying Time 2025 election spending data as of March 26, 2025, more than $81.4 million has been spent on the Wisconsin Supreme Court race between Dane County Circuit Court Judge Susan Crawford and Waukesha County Circuit Court Judge Brad Schimel, making it the most expensive state judicial election in US history.

A deeper examination shows that Super PACs have poured $49 million into the campaigns, with $35.5 million from outside groups backing Judge Brad Schimel and $13.5 million supporting Judge Susan Crawford

The race has also set a new benchmark for individual influence in a judicial election. Nearly 20% of all spending has come from two super PACs tied to Elon Musk — America PAC and Building America’s Future — which have contributed a combined $17.7 million to support Judge Brad Schimel.

Musk’s America PAC has spent $11.5 million, while his Building America’s Future Super PAC has added another $6 million. In addition, Musk made a personal donation of $2 million last week to the Wisconsin Republican Party, which then transferred $1.2 million directly to Schimel’s campaign, according to state filings.

Together, these contributions have vastly outpaced the funds raised by Schimel’s own campaign.

AP’s Jill Colvin reports that America PAC has used Musk’s donations to blanket Wisconsin with mailers featuring photos of President Donald Trump and messages such as “President Donald Trump needs your vote.”  Materials also say, “Susan Crawford will stop President Trump’s agenda.”

President Trump endorsed Judge Schimel, but he has not appeared with Schimel at any campaign events. Schimel has appeared at campaign events with Donald Trump Jr, where he posed with an inflatable version of the president.

Crawford’s campaign has incorporated anti-Super PAC messaging into her donation appeals and TV ads. According to Wisconsin Ethics Commission filings, A Better Wisconsin Together -- a Super PAC supporting Crawford -- has spent $6.2 million supporting her.

In an interview with the New York Times, Judge Crawford said her campaign had raised $24 million from 113,000 individual donors, including $17 million between February 4 and March 17 — all within Wisconsin’s $20,000 per-donor limit.

IVP Donate

Big Money, High Stakes, and the Threat to Judicial Independence

Musk made his personal feelings about the political stakes of the election explicit during a livestream event with Schimel and Ron Johnson over the weekend, saying he was helping to “preserve democracy in America.”

“It might not seem important, but it’s actually really important. And it could determine the fate of the country…This election is going to affect everyone in the United States," he said.

Musk added:

“I’m speaking personally here — in my view this is about preserving democracy in America, and not having ridiculous districts drawn that effectively disenfranchise voters in Wisconsin. That’s my number one issue. But there’s also a separate concern regarding judicial activism.”

Republicans currently hold 6 of Wisconsin's 8 US House seats. Musk warned that if this changes "we won’t be able to get through the changes that the American people want.”

Schimel told Musk on the live stream how thankful he was for the support:

“Your time is so valuable, and the things you’re involved in, the great things you’re accomplishing — I am so humbled that you took some time to help out with this this afternoon,” he said.

As Super PAC spending tops $49 million in Wisconsin, some voters might question whether true judicial independence can withstand the weight of so much outside money from so few people.

Let Us Vote : Sign Now!

Skepticism about money’s influence over politics is not unique to Wisconsin. In 2024, nearly 75% of Maine voters approved Question 1, a ballot measure to end Super PAC influence in state elections.

It's a clear sign of rising public frustration with the role of unlimited outside spending in American politics.

Stanford professor and democracy expert Larry Diamond recently warned of a growing culture of Super PAC intimidation and coercion in Congress. He pointed to 3 cases, specifically, in which Musk reportedly threatened to use his wealth to unseat lawmakers if they didn't support Trump's cabinet appointments.

Diamond noted that there is no way to verify these reports. However, he believes “it has long been obvious that Republican members of Congress have been running very, very scared,” and this kind of intimidation has factored into many members' decisions to retire.

Last week, IVN reported on the Super PAC arms race in the upcoming state Supreme Court election in Wisconsin and the national players driving it. You can read that article here

In this article

You Might Also Like

81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
83% Want Voter ID - So Why Is Congress Fighting It? SAVE Act Explained
83% Want Voter ID - So Why Is Congress Fighting It? SAVE Act Explained
Throughout this episode of the Independent Voter Podcast, the central theme remains clear: Americans broadly support common-sense reforms to strengthen election integrity and government accountability, but partisan strategy and fundraising incentives continue to stall meaningful change....
16 Feb, 2026
-
2 min read
Poll: Americans Reject 'Money = Speech' by Landslide; Want Power Back from Supreme Court
Poll: Americans Reject 'Money = Speech' by Landslide; Want Power Back from Supreme Court
A new poll from American Promise shows most Americans across the political spectrum agree: Money is not speech and unlimited political spending should not be protected as such under the First Amendment....
03 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read
Why Neither Side Wants the Truth About Voter ID
Why Neither Side Wants the Truth About Voter ID
Voter ID is treated like a five-alarm fire in American politics. That reaction says more about our dysfunctional political system than it does about voter ID itself. ...
06 Feb, 2026
-
3 min read
Oklahoma Independents Drive Massive Push to Open Primaries With State Question 836
Oklahoma Independents Drive Massive Push to Open Primaries With State Question 836
While much of the U.S. was slammed with severe winter weather over the weekend, volunteers for Oklahoma State Question 836 – which would end the use of taxpayer-funded closed primaries – made a final push to get their campaign to over 200,000 petition signatures....
27 Jan, 2026
-
3 min read
NEW POLL: California Governor’s Race Sees “None of the Above” Beat the Entire Democratic Field
NEW POLL: California Governor’s Race Sees “None of the Above” Beat the Entire Democratic Field
A new statewide poll conducted by the Independent Voter Project finds California’s independent voters overwhelmingly support the state’s nonpartisan primary system and express broad dissatisfaction with the direction of state politics....
12 Jan, 2026
-
4 min read