Skip to content
Subscribe

Latest Poll Points to Potential Trouble for 'Top Two' Measure in South Dakota

Amendment H, which would implement a nonpartisan top two primary system in South Dakota, may be in serious trouble. That is, if a recent News Watch poll is accurate.

Latest Poll Points to Potential Trouble for 'Top Two' Measure in South Dakota
Photo by Alex Shuper on Unsplash+. Unsplash+ license obtained by author.
Published:

Photo Credit: Alex Shuper / Unsplash

Amendment H, which would implement a nonpartisan top two primary system in South Dakota, may be in serious trouble. That is, if a recent South Dakota News Watch poll is accurate.

The poll, co-sponsored by the Chiesman Center for Democracy at USD, found that 55.8% of respondents said they plan to vote "No" on Amendment H, while 39.8% said "Yes."

This left only 4.4% undecided.

News Watch Poll

"The challenge with our Top Two open primary proposal is to make people aware of exactly how it works," said Joe Kirby of South Dakota Open Primaries.

"Once they understand that, they tend to say things like 'of course, why wouldn't we want that?'"

The primary election system proposed by Amendment H ends party primaries that are paid for by taxpayers but are closed to citizens outside the Republican and Democratic Parties.

It replaces this partisan primary system with a nonpartisan model in which all voters and candidates, regardless of party, have access to a single primary ballot.

Every candidate that qualifies to run in an election appears on the ballot, and every registered voter has an opportunity to vote for whomever they want in each race.

The top vote-getters move on to the general election to decide the winner between who voters determined to be the two most viable candidates.

Alaska, California, and Washington use similar primary systems. In Alaska, the top four vote-getters advance to the general election.

“The main argument for this amendment is fairness,” said Kirby. “All voters should have an equal voice in electing their representatives and leaders.”

Polling in June had Amendment H in a promising position. Then, 55% of respondents said they supported open primaries -- up from November 2023 when it was at 49%.

Now, the numbers have flipped.

The June and October polls were conducted by South Dakota News Watch and the Chiesman Center for Democracy and surveyed 500 registered voters.

The latest poll has a +/- 4.5% margin of error.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Latest Poll Points to Potential Trouble for 'Top Two' Measure in South Dakota

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us