Boston City Council Backs Ranked Choice Voting Home Rule Petition in 8–4 Vote

Boston
Photo by Getty Images on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by editor.
Published: 14 May, 2025
3 min read

BOSTON, MASS. — On May 14, the Boston City Council voted 8–4 in favor of a Home Rule Petition allowing voters to rank candidates in order of preference, a shift that could change how Bostonians elect their leaders.

If ultimately approved by state lawmakers and voters, the measure would implement ranked choice voting (RCV) in municipal elections. Under the proposal, voters could rank up to four candidates, including write-ins, for each race.

Running for President as an Independent: How it Really Works

In single-winner contests like the mayoral election, if no candidate receives more than 50% of first-choice votes, the lowest-ranked candidates are eliminated in successive rounds and their votes redistributed until one candidate earns a majority.

“This method ensures that the winning candidates have broad support and reflects a more representative electoral outcome,” Councilor Gabriela Coletta Zapata (East Boston, Charlestown, North End) explained in her Committee Chair Report on the proposal.

The measure now heads to Boston Mayor Michelle Wu. If she signs it, it would then require approval from the state legislature and the governor to appear as a local ballot question. 

According to the docket:

“Implementation of RCV in the City of Boston would not take effect unless approved by a majority of voters at a future election via a ballot question that would ask voters whether they accept the act titled 'An Act to Implement Ranked Choice Voting for the City of Boston.’ If the question passes, the law would take effect immediately but apply only to municipal elections occurring at least 365 days after the date of voter approval.” 

Zapata, who chaired the hearings on the proposal, said voters could see the change as early as 2028 or 2029.

Supporters of the measure emphasized increased voter choice and representation. “It’s an exciting day for democracy,” said Council President Ruthzee Louijeune, who introduced the measure.

IVP Donate

“Ranked choice voting is how we make sure that whoever’s elected is supported by the majority of the electorate,” Louijeune said in an interview with GBH News. She noted that under the current plurality system, a crowded field of candidates can result in no single candidate garnering more than 50% of the vote.

“Sometimes, you get people winning and they only get 30% of the vote, but that’s not who the majority of the electorate wanted,” she said.

Councilor Julia Mejia, an at-large member who immigrated to the US and whose first language is not English, pushed back on criticism that RCV is too complicated. “Immigrants are not dolts—they can learn a new voting system,” she said, emphasizing that RCV could open the door to candidates without deep financial backing.

Louijeune noted that Boston Election Commissioner Eneida Tavares testified that the city’s existing voting machines and systems can handle RCV, countering one councilor’s assertion.

Councilors Louijeune, Coletta Zapata, Mejia, Liz Breadon, Enrique Pepén, Brian Worrell, Ben Weber, and Sharon Santana supported the final vote on Docket #0144, Petition for a Special Law Re: Ranked Choice Voting in Boston. Councilors Ed Flynn, Sharon Durkan, Erin Murphy, and John FitzGerald opposed it.

“I think it’s always the right time to be working on democratic reform and how we improve our democracy,” Louijeune said when asked “why now” for ranked choice by GBH News.

Docket #0144 was originally filed as Docket #0996 in 2024. The Committee held a hearing on October 10, 2024, at which time the Committee heard from the City’s Election Department, RCV experts and advocates, and members of the public.

The Committee held working sessions on February 25, 2025, and April 4, 2025. Working session panelists included Eneida Tavares, Election Commissioner for the City of Boston, Sabino Piemonte, Head Assistant Registrar of Voters for the City of Boston, Ed Shoemaker, Executive Director of Ranked Choice Voting Boston, Cheryl Clyburn Crawford, Executive Director of MassVote, Rashan Hall, President and Chief Executive Office of Urban League of Eastern Massachusetts, and Greg Dennis, Policy Director for Voter Choice Massachusetts.

Let Us Vote : Sign Now!

In this article

You Might Also Like

ranked choice voting in maryland
Greenbelt Voters Deliver Overwhelming Win for Ranked Choice Voting in Maryland
With the national media focused on elections in New York City, New Jersey, Virginia, and California, one overlooked story was the expansion of ranked choice voting on Tuesday as Greenbelt, Maryland, joined the dozens of U.S. cities that have adopted and already use the reform....
05 Nov, 2025
-
3 min read
Alaska
Alaska Supreme Court Scrutinizes Church-Funded Effort to Undermine Open Primaries and RCV
The Alaska Supreme Court is considering whether opponents of open primaries and ranked-choice voting broke state law when they funneled money through a Washington-based church to support a repeal campaign....
03 Nov, 2025
-
2 min read
Curtis Sliwa voting.
The Most Disliked Candidate in the NYC Mayoral Race Isn't the Republican
The New York City mayoral election has drawn national attention in a way voters haven’t seen in modern history. This is because Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani, 33 and a self-described democratic socialist, is poised to win based on the latest polling....
27 Oct, 2025
-
5 min read
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read