AZ Initiative to End Partisan Primaries Survives Another Legal Challenge

Vote
Photo by Glenn Carrie on Unsplash
Created: 20 Aug, 2024
2 min read

Nonpartisan reformers know what is coming when they propose changing the way voters elect public officials. Inevitably, those who benefit from the status quo will turn to the courts to prevent voters from having a say.

It happened with Top Two in California. It happened with ranked choice voting in Maine. It happened with Top 4 with ranked choice voting in Alaska. In all of these instances, the parties and special interests failed.

In 2024, similar hurdles have been placed in front of many reform proposals that are slated to be on the ballot across the US. But once again, the efforts to give voters more choice in elections are prevailing.

In Arizona, the Make Elections Fair Arizona Act -- now known as Proposition 140 -- has faced multiple court challenges from both major parties and their allied special interest groups.

To quicky sum up: Prop 140 proposes eliminating party primaries in favor of a nonpartisan primary system in which all voters and candidates have an opportunity to participate on a single ballot.

Voters are not treated differently because of their party status or lack thereof, and every candidate would have the same signature requirement to appear on the primary ballot.

It would be up to the state legislature or secretary of state to decide what nonpartisan election model to use. The only requirement is that primaries have to be nonpartisan in all cases, except for president.

Presidential preference elections in Arizona are closed to party members only. Prop 140 says if parties keep them closed, they will have to pay for them -- not taxpayers, many of whom have no say in these elections.

Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Melissa Iyer Julian ruled last week that the Republican-controlled Arizona Legislative Council improperly tried to influence Arizonans to vote against the initiative.

More Choice for San Diego

Lawmakers tried to paint it as a ranked choice voting initiative. However, the adoption of ranked choice voting exists purely as a hypothetical in the initiative depending on the system lawmakers adopt.

It is not required. 

This decision followed another court's ruling that Prop. 140 did not violate the state's single-subject rule for proposed constitutional amendments. The lawsuit was brought by the Arizona Free Enterprise Club.

Then, on Thursday, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Frank Moskowitz largely rejected a Democrat-backed lawsuit challenging the legitimacy of the signatures gathered to put Prop. 140 on the ballot.

Make Elections Fair AZ submitted over 580,000 signatures to certify its initiative. Most of the signatures were validated by the secretary of state's office. The proposal needed 384,000 signatures for certification.

Judge Moskowitz, who also ruled in the Arizona Free Enterprise Club case, said Prop 140 had enough valid signatures to be on the ballot, though he did invalidate nearly 17,000 signatures.

The door isn't completely shut on these legal challenges. The Arizona Free Enterprise Club appealed its single-subject lawsuit to the state supreme court. For now, however, voters will have a say on the future of their elections.

Related articles

businessman holding his hands to his face.
New Poll: Half of US Voters Say They Voted For 'Lesser of Two Evils' in 2024
Photo by  Citizen Data polled US voters following the 2024 elections and found that nearly half (47%...
09 Dec, 2024
-
2 min read
Andrew Yang
Andrew Yang: Democrats Have Only Themselves to Blame
Photo Credit: ...
11 Nov, 2024
-
2 min read

Latest articles

US capitol building shown upside down in small orb.
DC Appeals Court Revives Democrats' Effort to Kill the Already Approved Initiative 83
Alex Koma of Loose Lips @WCP reports that a significant legal battle over Initiative 83 (I-83) has been reignited after the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled on February 6, 2025, to remand the case to Superior Court ...
10 Feb, 2025
-
2 min read
White House at night.
The Death of Checks and Balances and The Rise of the Imperial Presidency
In his first three weeks back in office, President Trump has already floated taking control of Gaza, authorized Elon Musk to overhaul the Treasury with college interns, and signed more executive orders than most presidents do in a year. While critics argue he's trampling constitutional limits on presidential power, is Trump really breaking new ground - or just building on a century of executive overreach?...
10 Feb, 2025
-
1 min read
American flag in shadow.
Where Is the Hope?
From 2013 to 2016, I authored over 40 articles published by the Independent Voter Network (IVN). I wrote to overcome the partisan divisiveness which had paralyzed our federal government. I wrote about organizations, candidates, individuals and efforts that emphasized non-partisan solutions to the issues we face in America. Hope and positivity were my mantra....
10 Feb, 2025
-
3 min read