AZ Initiative to End Partisan Primaries Survives Another Legal Challenge

Vote
Photo by Glenn Carrie on Unsplash
Published: 20 Aug, 2024
Updated: 18 Jun, 2025
2 min read

Nonpartisan reformers know what is coming when they propose changing the way voters elect public officials. Inevitably, those who benefit from the status quo will turn to the courts to prevent voters from having a say.

It happened with Top Two in California. It happened with ranked choice voting in Maine. It happened with Top 4 with ranked choice voting in Alaska. In all of these instances, the parties and special interests failed.

In 2024, similar hurdles have been placed in front of many reform proposals that are slated to be on the ballot across the US. But once again, the efforts to give voters more choice in elections are prevailing.

In Arizona, the Make Elections Fair Arizona Act -- now known as Proposition 140 -- has faced multiple court challenges from both major parties and their allied special interest groups.

To quicky sum up: Prop 140 proposes eliminating party primaries in favor of a nonpartisan primary system in which all voters and candidates have an opportunity to participate on a single ballot.

Voters are not treated differently because of their party status or lack thereof, and every candidate would have the same signature requirement to appear on the primary ballot.

It would be up to the state legislature or secretary of state to decide what nonpartisan election model to use. The only requirement is that primaries have to be nonpartisan in all cases, except for president.

Presidential preference elections in Arizona are closed to party members only. Prop 140 says if parties keep them closed, they will have to pay for them -- not taxpayers, many of whom have no say in these elections.

Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Melissa Iyer Julian ruled last week that the Republican-controlled Arizona Legislative Council improperly tried to influence Arizonans to vote against the initiative.

IVP Donate

Lawmakers tried to paint it as a ranked choice voting initiative. However, the adoption of ranked choice voting exists purely as a hypothetical in the initiative depending on the system lawmakers adopt.

It is not required. 

This decision followed another court's ruling that Prop. 140 did not violate the state's single-subject rule for proposed constitutional amendments. The lawsuit was brought by the Arizona Free Enterprise Club.

Then, on Thursday, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Frank Moskowitz largely rejected a Democrat-backed lawsuit challenging the legitimacy of the signatures gathered to put Prop. 140 on the ballot.

Make Elections Fair AZ submitted over 580,000 signatures to certify its initiative. Most of the signatures were validated by the secretary of state's office. The proposal needed 384,000 signatures for certification.

Judge Moskowitz, who also ruled in the Arizona Free Enterprise Club case, said Prop 140 had enough valid signatures to be on the ballot, though he did invalidate nearly 17,000 signatures.

The door isn't completely shut on these legal challenges. The Arizona Free Enterprise Club appealed its single-subject lawsuit to the state supreme court. For now, however, voters will have a say on the future of their elections.

In this article

Related articles

state of Louisiana with a closed stamp over it.
Louisiana’s New Voting System: Closed, Confusing, and Costly
Louisiana is making the switch to closed partisan primaries for some elections in 2026, using a syst...
30 Jul, 2025
-
6 min read
Stop light with the capitol building in the background.
DC Dems to Independent Voters: You Don’t Matter
The DC City Council had one final opportunity to fund a provision approved by 73% of city voters in November that would open primary elections to 83,000+ independent voters – and the Democratic-controlled body elected instead not to honor the will of voters....
29 Jul, 2025
-
2 min read
Michael Smerconish
Michael Smerconish Leads Lawsuit Against Both Political Parties
CNN host Michael Smerconish is a Pennsylvania voter who is denied access to taxpayer-funded primaries because he is a registered non-party affiliate (independent). He is also one of the plaintiffs in a new lawsuit challenging his state’s use of closed primaries. ...
22 Jul, 2025
-
1 min read

Latest articles

Gas station weed signs next to Texas flag
Texas Senate Votes to Ban Gas Station Weed Again -- Will Abbott Go Along This Time?
AUSTIN, TX — The Texas Senate on August 1 passed a bill that would ban all intoxicating hemp-derived...
01 Aug, 2025
-
2 min read
House of Cards logo in front of Texas Capitol
Texas Redistricting Drama Turns into 'House of Cards' Episode
As Texas Republicans push forward with a controversial plan to redraw the state’s congressional districts, Democrats are weighing whether to deploy one of their most extreme forms of resistance: a quorum break....
31 Jul, 2025
-
4 min read
US Capitol Building with American Flags in front.
Five Seats, One Revolution: Independents Launch Political Disruptor
One week after hosting its inaugural event in DC, the founders of The Independent Center announced the formation of the Independent PAC, a hybrid political action committee designed to do one thing: deny the two major parties a majority in Congress....
31 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read