AZ Judge: Lawmakers 'Strategically' Tried to Mislead Voters on Initiative to End Partisan Primaries

court house
Photo by Colin Lloyd on Unsplash.
Created: 14 Aug, 2024
2 min read

Photo by Colin Lloyd on Unsplash.

 

Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Melissa Iyer Julian on Monday sided with reformers who claimed that Arizona lawmakers were intentionally trying to mislead voters about their initiative to end partisan primaries.

Make Elections Fair AZ filed over 580,000 signatures to get an initiative -- now known as Proposition 140 -- on the ballot that would require the state to use nonpartisan primaries in which all voters and candidates participate on a single primary ballot.

And, every candidate running would have the same signature requirement, regardless of party affiliation or lack thereof, to obtain ballot access.

The initiative does not explicitly state what nonpartisan system Arizona would use. It, however, offers guidance for state lawmakers to decide for themselves as long as the system is fair to voters and candidates.

And, if lawmakers refuse to adopt a new system, the task will fall to Arizona's secretary of state -- the state's top elections administrator. 

There are two main requirements in the initiative: The first, and most important, is an end to partisan primaries for all elections except presidential preference elections.

However, the initiative stipulates that if parties keep presidential preference elections closed to independent voters, they will have to pay for the elections themselves.

More Choice for San Diego

The second requirement is that the nonpartisan system ensure a majority winner. For elections that produce a single winner, this could mean using a ranked voting method if 3 or more candidates advance from the primary.

This is an "if," not a requirement.

Make Elections Fair AZ filed a lawsuit in response to description language for Prop. 140 adopted by the Arizona Legislative Council that focuses on ranked choice voting -- making it look like an RCV initiative.

Again, it is not about ranked choice voting. It's about primary reform. Make Elections Fair asserted that state lawmakers intentionally used language that would make the initiative less popular with voters.

Judge Julian agreed.

“[T]he analysis misleadingly suggests that, if the Initiative is enacted, the candidate who receives the most votes would no longer be declared the victor in ‘all’ Arizona elections," the judge wrote.

She further ruled:

"The Court finds that that this is a ‘rhetorical strategy’ devised to dissuade voters from supporting the Initiative by confusing when and how voter ranking would be used under the Initiative and implying that it would result in the unfair election of candidates who did not receive the highest number of the votes.”

More Choice for San Diego

She added that the strategy used by lawmakers "is ‘tinged with partisan coloring’ and violates the requirement of neutrality.” State lawmakers have until August 29 to rewrite Prop. 140's description. 

The decision follows closely after another legal victory for Make Elections Fair. A judge ruled last week that contrary to assertions made in a lawsuit by the Arizona Free Enterprise Club, Prop. 140 does not violate the state's single-subject rule. 

The Arizona Free Enterprise Club has also sued over petition signatures, claiming that Make Elections Fair illegally obtained half the signatures it submitted to certify its initiative.

Related articles

Votes
MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers
Photo by . Today, I am proud to share an exciting milestone in my journey as an advocate for democra...
23 Jan, 2025
-
12 min read
Image of voters at a polling location.
Bill Filed to Close Indiana's Critical Primary Elections
Photo by  Indiana lawmakers will consider a bill filed in the state's House of Representatives that ...
07 Jan, 2025
-
2 min read

Latest articles

Votes
MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers
The Chamberlain Project, an organization I co-founded with Peter Ackerman a decade ago, has been dissolved. The Chamberlain Boards have voted to combine all of Chamberlain’s associated entities, including Americans Elect, Level the Playing Field, the Committee for Ranked Choice Voting, and Citizens to End SuperPACs, with the Foundation for Independent Voter Education (FIVE),...
23 Jan, 2025
-
12 min read
press badges and credentials
To Help Heal Division, We Must Cut "The Media" Some Slack
Donald Trump will be inaugurated in a few days. In his second term, just as in his first, he’ll likely spark passionate disagreements about news media: what is “fake news” and what isn’t, which media sources should be trusted and which should be doubted....
23 Jan, 2025
-
4 min read
American flag on a bridge.
'We the People' Must Take Action to Address Our Colossal Challenges
Long before I moved to the United States from rural Greece and ever heard the phrase “we the people,” I grew up with a constant and clear illustration of the power of community. Although “we the people” wasn’t a phrase that translated into Greek, it was one of the cornerstones of Greek society....
23 Jan, 2025
-
4 min read