Arkansas Voters Reject Attack on Citizen Initiative Process

Published: 09 Nov, 2022
2 min read

An overwhelming majority of Arkansas voters rejected Issue 2 on the ballot Tuesday. The measure would have raised the minimum threshold to pass future state ballot initiatives to 60% of the vote, and no doubt would have deterred many future reform efforts in the state.

"We are extremely happy that Arkansans overwhelmingly defeated Issue 2 & kept power where it belongs - in the hands of voters,” said Bonnie Miller, chair of Protect AR Constitution.

“We sent a clear message to politicians & lobbyists trying to steal our constitutional rights: STOP."

Issue 2 was a legislative-referred measure, which means a majority of state lawmakers voted to put it on the ballot. A “yes” vote on the measure would have affected not just changes to the state constitution but any citizen ballot initiative – an unprecedented restriction on voters’ rights.

Twenty-six states allow citizen-led ballot initiatives, but none of them require more than a simple majority for state statutes or veto referendums. Florida, Utah, and Washington, however, have a supermajority requirement for specific constitutional changes.

The attack on the citizen initiative process is not isolated to a single state. RepresentUs released a report that found that since 2017, 64 bills have been proposed in state legislatures across the country to make it harder to get citizen initiatives on the ballot and pass them.

None of these efforts succeeded, but that doesn’t mean lawmakers will stop trying. Elected officials have increased these efforts as citizens use their power to reform an electoral and political process rigged against them.

Notably, raising the vote threshold by ten percentage points would have a devastating impact on many citizen-led campaigns. The amount of money, resources, and people needed on the ground to reach enough voters to attempt 60% would rise exponentially.

Make no mistake: That is the point. Raising the bar on citizen initiatives is meant to be a deterrent to stop future campaigns before they can get off the ground.

South Dakota voters soundly defeated a constitutional amendment similar to Issue 2 in June.

IVP Donate

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read