Skip to content
Subscribe

After First RCV Election, Charlottesville Voters Back the Reform: 'They Get It, They Like It, They Want to Do It Again'

A new survey out of Charlottesville, Virginia, shows overwhelming support for ranked choice voting (RCV) following the city’s first use of the system in its June Democratic primary for City Council. Conducted one week after the election, the results found that nearly 90% of respondents support conti

After First RCV Election, Charlottesville Voters Back the Reform: 'They Get It, They Like It, They Want to Do It Again'
Photo by Planet Volumes on Unsplash. Unsplash+ license obtained by IVN Editor Shawn Griffiths..
Published:

CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. - A new survey out of Charlottesville, Virginia, shows overwhelming support for ranked choice voting (RCV) following the city’s first use of the system in its June Democratic primary for City Council. Conducted one week after the election, the results found that nearly 90% of respondents support continued use of RCV.

Additionally, 80% expressed strong support for its continued use.

The survey, conducted by Murmuration, was sent via text message to 8,699 voters who had participated in a local primary in recent cycles with a response rate of 4.4%. Survey respondents mirrored the broader voting population in terms of geography, demographics, and voting patterns.

Figures show that support for RCV was strong across age, race, gender, education level, and homeownership status. The only group with majority opposition was a small subset (5% of voters) who were dissatisfied with the election winners.

Charlottesville is only the second municipality in Virginia, after Arlington County, to use RCV for local elections. Election reform advocates say the feedback from voters reflects what other cities across the US have found: when voters get to use RCV, they understand it and embrace it.

“The results show what RCV cities across the country already know: when voters finally get to use ranked choice voting, they get it, they like it, and they want to do it again,” said Sally Hudson, Executive Director of Ranked Choice Virginia.

Voters Were Ready — and Confident

The City of Charlottesville and Hudson’s group led voter education campaigns ahead of the primary, which according to the survey seemed to have paid off:

  • More than 90% of voters knew they’d be using RCV before casting their ballot.
  • 96% said they were comfortable marking their ballot, and fewer than 4% had major questions or concerns.
  • Over 90% of voters understood how their votes would be counted, with 62% expressing complete confidence.

The survey also comes after an NYC exit poll found that primary voters in the nation’s largest city continue to find RCV to be simple, fair, and easy. RCV advocates look at this data as validation for the reform and a counter to claims that it confuses voters.

Winners Had Broad-Based Support

Election results showed that Jen Fleisher, a first-time candidate, received 51% of first-choice votes, while incumbent Mayor Juandiego Wade earned 36%. Together, they were the first choice of 87% of voters — a notable indicator of majority representation.

Further analysis of second-choice rankings, using data from the city’s ballot scanners, revealed that:

  • 47% of voters saw both their top two candidates win.
  • No other candidate pairing would have resulted in greater voter satisfaction — not Wade and incumbent Brian Pinkston (35%), nor Fleisher and Pinkston (27%).

RCV supporters argue that the outcome illustrates one of RCV’s key strengths: delivering proportional representation. About half of voters preferred an incumbent and half preferred a newcomer — and they got one of each.

Despite critics’ warnings, the election proceeded with minimal technical issues. Just 30 ballots were invalidated due to marking errors, and half came from in-person voters who declined the offer of a replacement ballot.

Turnout was consistent with recent primaries: approximately 6,200 ballots were cast, similar to Charlottesville’s 2019 and 2021 Democratic primaries.

What’s Next?

The survey results will be part of a formal report presented to the Charlottesville City Council later this summer. Council members will consider whether to continue using RCV in future elections – a decision that could have a broader impact in Virginia.

Arlington County may be the only other jurisdiction in Virginia that uses RCV, but other localities are considering adopting it. Arlington County first used RCV for its county board elections in 2023, and interest in the system has grown across the state since.

As Hudson put it: “Voters in Charlottesville just joined a national trend — and they’re making it clear they want ranked choice voting to stay."

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

After First RCV Election, Charlottesville Voters Back the Reform: 'They Get It, They Like It, They Want to Do It Again'

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us