Skip to content

Court Grants Johnson, Stein Extension in Anti-Trust Case Against Debate Commission

Court Grants Johnson, Stein Extension in Anti-Trust Case Against Debate Commission
Published:

Gary Johnson and Jill Stein still plan to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Johnson v. Commission on Presidential Debates, their case using federal anti-trust law to attack the exclusionary policy of the Commission on Presidential Debates. Their cert petition was originally due at the end of November, but the Court has granted an extension to file. The cert petition is now due December 27.

Editor's note: This update originally published on Ballot Access News, and has been republished on IVN with permission from the author.

Richard Winger

Richard Lee Winger is an American political activist and analyst. He is the publisher and editor of Ballot Access News.

IVN is rated Center by AllSides and High Credibility by MBFC — follow our independent journalism in your feed.

Add IVN on Google

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.