Skip to content
Subscribe

America prepares for potential war with Iran over nuclear program

Published:

According to a recent Fox News poll, 60% of voters believe military force will be necessary to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.  51% of independents, 51% of Democrats, and 75% of Republicans think a military strike will be required to thwart Iranian development of a nuclear weapons program.

If Iran were to develop such a program, 56% of voters believe it would be a disaster for security, while 37% believe it would be a "problem that can be managed".  50% of independents, 51% of Democrats, and 66% of Republicans believe it would prove a threat to US security.

As talks, under both the Bush and Obama administrations, have failed to yield any clear progress on halting Iranian nuclear development (whether for peaceful and/or military purposes), it appears as if the prospect of a military conflict is growing by the day.  Recently, the US Senate joined the House in drafting its own version of a bill that would allow President Obama to enforce more severe sanctions on the Islamic republic.

Much like the buildup to the Iraq war, are we witnessing the initial steps toward a full-fledged military strike against Iran?

Supporters of military action claim that Iran is in the final phases of developing nuclear weapons and that its oppressive regime repesents a direct threat to US national security, as well as Israel's.  According to supporters, if Iran goes nuclear, it will be able to threaten the US and Israel, and sell its technology to terrorist groups.

Skeptics, however, point to a $1.4 trillion budget deficit, $14 trillion national debt, and the potential for skyrocketing oil prices as economic barriers to yet another war theater in the Middle East.  They also point to the fact that both the United States and Israel possess a far greater military capability than Iran, even if it were to acquire nuclear technology.  Some skeptics also challenge the accuracy of US intelligence, since the intelligence community's declarations regarding weapons of mass destruction and a Saddam Hussein-Al Qaeda link proved to be erroneous in Iraq.

Readers, what do you think?  Let's hear your thoughts on the matter.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

America prepares for potential war with Iran over nuclear program

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us