Skip to content
Subscribe

Lawsuit: Ending Two-Party Duopoly over Debates Will Lead to More Competitive Elections

Published:

As IVN recently reported, the lawsuit filed by the Green and Libertarian parties arguing that the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) violated anti-trust laws was dismissed in federal court. Fortunately, the lawsuit to open the debates filed by Level the Playing Field (the successor to Americans Elect) and Peter Ackerman – joined by the Green and Libertarian parties – is still very much alive.

Level the Playing Field’s lawsuit argues that the Federal Election Commission (FEC) arbitrarily and capriciously failed to recognize the obvious: That the CPD is a partisan organization whose debate access rules serve only the interests of the Democratic and Republican parties in maintaining their stranglehold on our nation’s electoral processes.

Though the judge’s decision in our case likely will not affect the 2016 presidential campaign, this is hardly an idle exercise. If Level the Playing Field wins the lawsuit with the kind of ruling we hope for, then the entire presidential election process can be reimagined and re-engineered for subsequent elections beginning in 2020.

READ MORE: Group Sues FEC to Open Presidential Debates to Independent Candidates

We are confident that had this lawsuit prevailed two years ago, many qualified and inspiring Americans without affiliation with either the Democratic or Republican parties would have run for president in 2016. The American voter would now have excellent choices in addition to Trump and Clinton, who are each viewed negatively by a record percentage of the American public.

This potential effect on future elections explains why the FEC, which is run by members of the two major parties, has fought our lawsuit and prior efforts to reform the CPD so diligently. While the major parties may no longer have any ideological coherence, they intend to jealously guard their gatekeeper status for aspiring presidential candidates into the foreseeable future.

As Americans Elect proved – by completing the largest signature drive in U.S. history – there are tens of millions of Americans who want to vote for an unaffiliated presidential contender. If our lawsuit prevails, we will have taken a gigantic step toward fulfilling that possibility. Then the 43%(and growing) who identify as unaffiliated voters could unite with the 27% moderate voters from both parties and create a winner capable of governing in everyone’s interest.

Level the Playing Field’s lawsuit is now been fully argued in federal court by both sides and a ruling can come at any time. Stay tuned.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Lawsuit: Ending Two-Party Duopoly over Debates Will Lead to More Competitive Elections

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us