In Election, Republican Gabriel Gomez Seeks Independents

In Election, Republican Gabriel Gomez Seeks Independents
Published: 18 Jun, 2013
2 min read

(Credit: DailyKos.com)

(Credit: DailyKos.com)

There is only one week until the Massachusetts US Senate special election and the two contenders find themselves in a tightening race. The deciding factor may come down to the independents' share of the vote.

Vacated when President Barack Obama nominated John Kerry to become secretary of state, a US Senate seat in Massachusetts became vacant for the second time in four years. In 2009, Sen. Edward Kennedy died and Republican legislator Scott Brown won a special election in 2010.

The winner of the seat will finish the uncompleted term and will face another election in November 2014.

In the 2013 contest, Republican Gabriel Gomez faces Democratic US Rep. Edward Markey. Gomez is a political newcomer while Markey has been in office since 1976.

The son of Colombian immigrants and a private equity investor, Gomez may be the face of a new Republican Party in the 21st Century. A former donor to President Obama's 2008 campaign, Gomez takes a moderate stance on abortion and supports gay marriage. Also a former Navy SEAL, he has quickly taken a hawkish position on Syria by urging the president to adopt a no-fly zone.

Normally, a Republican would not expect to fare well in the Bay State, a state where Democratic voter registration triples that of Republicans. Although Republican voter registration is low, there are more independents than any other designation in the state.

According to the Real Clear Politics polling average, Markey leads Gomez by 9.6 percent. In one of the closer polls, Suffolk University has Gomez trailing by only six. More than half of the respondents in the Suffolk poll were independents.

The key to Scott Brown's upset victory in 2010 was by winning 65 percent of independent voters. For Gomez to prevail, he may need to win a similar share of the independent vote. In a quote to the Daily Caller from a Massachusetts polling agency:

IVP Donate

"At this point, you have to expect Republicans to win . . . . But because of the 3-to-1 Democratic registration advantage over Republicans, a Republicans has to not just win  but really run up the score by 30 points."

A poll from the Boston Globe has Gomez winning independents 51-43.

As with most special elections, the key is voter turn-out. In the case of Massachusetts, it is not the Democrats, but the independents who should decide the race. Recent history suggests that it is possible for a Republican like Gomez to win in a state dominated by elected Democrats. Yet, for Gabriel Gomez to pull off another Republican upset in Massachusetts, he has to not simply win the independent vote, but dominate it.

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read