Fast Foods are Not Political Icons

image
Published: 03 Aug, 2012
2 min read

There’s been enough controversy regarding Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy’s comments opposing same-sex marriage and the responses to it. Several weeks ago a similar flare up occurred when Oreo cookies supported same-sex marriage.

Regardless of where you stand on same-sex marriage, we should all realize that choosing our fast foods based on its stance on same-sex marriage is absolutely ridiculous.

When we survey the great history of protest and collective speech Americans are getting fat and lazy. Think of Gandhi, the Revolution, the 60’s, even Occupy, all times when people stood up for what they believed in. The collective ‘we’ took a risk and put up a fight, whether we won or not.

But not anymore, now we have lowered ourselves to protesting by lining up in hour-long drive-thru lines to stuff our faces in support of a political position. Or, more simply, the same-sex marriage debate has been lowered to a battle of consumption.

Instead of taking to the streets, we are taking a headfirst dive into higher cholesterol, diabetes, and obesity in support of a political position. Good work America.

Opponents of same-sex marriage lining up in a fast food restaurant does not create a great day in American history. Equally, refusing to eat a gender-neutral fried chicken sandwich based on the political views of the corporate label stamped on its wrapper is asinine.

If you want to make a political statement or support or oppose any particular controversy it is going to take more effort and will power than eating. So, both sides, enough with the name calling, enough with the rhetoric, enough with the fatty foods as political icons.

If you wish to have a real dialogue, take a position that requires more intelligence than deciding which unhealthy food you will eat. Please enlighten us on your position aside from consumption and let the rest of us make a decision.

You Might Also Like

Trump sitting in the oval office with a piece of paper with a cannabis leaf on his desk.
Is Trump About to Outflank Democrats on Cannabis? Progressives Sound the Alarm
As President Donald Trump signals renewed interest in reclassifying cannabis from a Schedule I drug to Schedule III, a policy goal long championed by liberals and libertarians, the reaction among some partisan progressive advocates is not celebration, but concern....
08 Dec, 2025
-
5 min read
Malibu, California.
From the Palisades to Simi Valley, Independent Voters Poised to Decide the Fight to Replace Jacqui Irwin
The coastline that defines California’s mythology begins here. From Malibu’s winding cliffs to the leafy streets of Brentwood and Bel Air, through Topanga Canyon and into the valleys of Calabasas, Agoura Hills, and Thousand Oaks, the 42nd Assembly District holds some of the most photographed, most coveted, and most challenged terrain in the state. ...
10 Dec, 2025
-
6 min read
Ranked choice voting
Ranked Choice for Every Voter? New Bill Would Transform Every Congressional Election by 2030
As voters brace for what is expected to be a chaotic and divisive midterm election cycle, U.S. Representatives Jamie Raskin (Md.), Don Beyer (Va.), and U.S. Senator Peter Welch (Vt.) have re-introduced legislation that would require ranked choice voting (RCV) for all congressional primaries and general elections beginning in 2030....
10 Dec, 2025
-
3 min read