New EPA regulations could impact Arizona

image
Bob MorrisBob Morris
Published: 01 Jul, 2011
2 min read

The Navajo Generating Station near Page, AZ uses about 8 million tons of coal a year to provide 2.25 GW of power and nearly 95% of the electricity for the huge pumps on the Central Arizona Project canal that bring water from the Colorado River.

The US Environmental Protection Agency is releasing new regulations controlling nitrogen oxides. This directly impacts the generating station and could force it to spend as much as $1.2 billion to install a new control system, as well as millions of dollars a year to maintain it.   Among the most prevalent of the nitrogen oxides is nitrogen dioxide. It:

"forms quickly from emissions from cars, trucks and buses, power plants, and off-road equipment. In addition to contributing to the formation of ground-level ozone, and fine particle pollution, NO2 is linked with a number of adverse effects on the respiratory system", says the EPA.

The various nitrogen oxides are believed to make asthma worse and contribute to acid rain.

No one quite knows yet what the impact of the EPA regulations will be. A worst case scenario would be that the plant operator can't afford to make the changes and shuts the plant down. The pumps would presumably still be operational as the power would be generated someplace else. But the cost of electricity and water would unquestionably increase, as would the cost of agriculture. This could also push some farmers over the financial edge. In addition, Navaho Nation and the Hopi Tribe would lose millions in wages, royalties, and lease payments.

A potential shutdown of the Navajo Generating Station (or increase in its operating costs), in addition to impacting Arizona, would cause Nevada and the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power to scramble for new sources of power, or pay more, as they both get power from it.  Nevada Energy uses 11.3% of that power while LA DWP takes 21.2% (The dirty little secret of Los Angeles electricity is that much of it comes from coal plants on Indian land in other states, as coal plants are banned in California, even as a few tiny ones still exist there).

It is certainly possible that some are being alarmist about what the new pollution controls would cost (and lest we forget, these regulations will affect all coal plants.) But it seems clear the new controls will cost substantial amounts of money and those costs will be passed on in higher costs for electricity, water, and food.

You Might Also Like

Ethan Penner
Could This Well-Funded Independent Upend the CA Governor’s Race?
Ethan Penner, a Calabasas businessman, author, and educator with a storied career in real estate finance, has officially announced his intention to run for California governor in 2026 as an independent. On his campaign website, Penner says he is running to “disrupt the failing two-party system.” ...
12 Sep, 2025
-
5 min read
Supreme Court of the United States
Forward Party Joins Petition to SCOTUS Against State of Florida
Right now, the divide between the Republican and Democratic Parties appears beyond repair. The political rhetoric is toxic, the nation’s leadership puts party gain before lasting solutions, and few voters actually feel heard by the people elected to represent them. At a time when it seems things will only get worse from here, the Independent Voter Project filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court along with Open Primaries and the Forward Party in support of a lawsuit that targets one of the biggest culprits behind all of this....
16 Sep, 2025
-
3 min read
congress flag
Poll: 82% of Americans Want Redistricting Done by Independent Commission, Not Politicians
There may be no greater indication that voters are not being listened to in the escalating redistricting war between the Republican and Democratic Parties than a new poll from NBC News that shows 8-in-10 Americans want the parties to stop....
10 Sep, 2025
-
3 min read