Skip to content
Subscribe

Police labor deal seemingly balances Los Angeles budget

Published:

When Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa signed the 2011-12 budget earlier this month, he claimed that he had erased the city's $336 million deficit. The only problem was that “the most far-reaching pension concessions package in the United States of America” (Villaraigosa's words) required concessions from LAPD staff that weren't yet offered.

Apparently, a tentative agreement between the Los Angeles Police Protective League (LAPPL) and city officials regarding their new three-year labor contract has made good on the mayor's promise of $41 million in give-backs from police.  Police union members have agreed to freeze their salaries for the fiscal year beginning July 1, in exchange for increased overtime benefits and incremental raises of 3 percent next year and 4 percent in 2013-14.  Paul Weber, LAPPL president, told reporters last Friday that neither side got everything it wanted, but the contract is fair. Weber said he wouldn't divulge anymore details until the deal is presented to members for ratification.

What is known is that the city budget cut police overtime pay by $80 million earlier this month, and last week's negotiations between city officials and police union representatives centered around this issue.  Officials threatened to cut the 250-hour maximum of overtime to 96 hours and impose furloughs without a new contract. Police Chief Charlie Beck said that such a move would force him to reassign officers on specialized units to regular patrol duty, creating a public safety risk. The tentative agreement allows officers to bank up to 800 hours in paid-time-off rather than collect overtime.

The proposed contract would retain the $1,060 monthly health care subsidy paid by the city, but now police officers would be required to contribute to their retirement health care account. The subsidy would rise about 5 percent per year.

The majority of city workers through their civilian unions have agreed to similar deals. City Administrative Officer Miguel Santana said he expects the city to save $300 million over the life of the contract.

"Combined with the 20 percent salary reduction for starting officers agreed to in the last contract, and the new sworn pension tier approved by the voters, this agreement significantly curtails the city's projected pension and post-retirement benefit costs," Santana said.

Officials hope the plan will serve as a model for the United Firefighters of Los Angeles City.  Representatives from the Protective League said they will comment after the proposal is voted on by members.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Police labor deal seemingly balances Los Angeles budget

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us