Skip to content
Subscribe

President Obama: Polarizer-in-Chief

Published:

According to Gallup, President Obama has been one of the most polarizing Presidents since 1953.  In his first year, 88% of Democrats and 23% of Republicans approved of his performance, representing a 65 point partisan gap.  This easily outranked the previous record of 52 points during President Bill Clinton's first year.  But, in President Obama's second year, the gap grew to 68 points, with 81% of Democrats and 13% of Republicans approving of his performance.  This easily defeated the 56 point record during President Ronald Reagan's second year.  Overall, Obama's 68 point gap ranks 4th place all-time, trailing President George W. Bush's top three worst finishes at 70, 72, and 76 points respectively.

Like President George W. Bush, President Obama entered office proclaiming that he would unite the country, work successfully across the aisle, and change the tone of DC's venomous partisanship.  Thus far, the numbers seem to indicate that President Obama, like President George W. Bush, has failed in this arena.  America remains a highly divided nation.

However, I would argue that President Obama does not deserve all the blame.  For example, shouldn't a much higher percentage of Republicans approve of Obama's performance?  After all, President Obama recently extended Bush's tax cuts and has followed a virtually identical foreign policy to that of Bush, spending even more money on the military, sending 51,000 more troops to Afghanistan, and launching a record number of drone strikes in Pakistan.  Tax cuts and a hawkish foreign policy were stalwarts of the George W. Bush era.

And shouldn't a much higher percentage of Democrats disapprove of Obama's performance?  After all, he has continued, even escalated, George W. Bush's foreign policy, extended Bush's much-maligned tax cuts, backed down on a public health care option, done little on immigration reform and the environment, and remained resistant to gay marriage.

Perhaps the American people should bear part of the blame, then. Obama's approval rating, like that of Bush, may be more reflective of a populace that has succumbed to mindless partisanship, rather than independent-minded critical thinking.  "Cheering for one's team" has replaced fair-minded evaluation and results-oriented policy assessment.

And what have been the results over the last ten years?  A moderate recession, a severe recession, record budget deficits, $9 trillion of more debt, stagnant wages, higher prices, nearly 6,000 dead and over 40,000 wounded US troops, and deteriorating education performance just to name a few.

Enough said.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

President Obama: Polarizer-in-Chief

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us