$8 billion or else

image
Ryan JaroncykRyan Jaroncyk
Published: 23 Dec, 2009
1 min read

Governor Schwarzenegger is demanding $8 billion in federal aid, or else he promises to enact massive cuts to a $21 billion budget deficit. Both Schwarzenegger and Senate President Pro Tem, Darrell Steinberg, are lobbying the Federal Government for billions to plug yet another monolithic state budget gap.  The Governor is warning, that absent any significant federal aid, he may be forced to severely cut CalWORKS (the state's primary welfare program), In-Home Healthcare Services, and two large tax breaks for big corporations.  He will also propose an extension to state worker furloughs, amounting to a 14% pay cut, as well as obtaining revenue from an offshore oil drilling platform off the coast of Santa Barbara.

Facing another round of crushing deficits, the Governor and state Legislature will likely adopt a number of desperate financial measures to stop the bleeding.  Excessive borrowing and spending, and subpar tax revenue due to high unemployment and a small business collapse have left the golden state with a projected $83 billion shortfall over the next four years.

Couple a severe deficit with an election year, and 2010 may prove to be a very tumultuous year for Californians.  The continued economic misery serves as clear cut evidence for the urgent necessity of novel ideas, fresh solutions, and brand new perspectives in Sacramento.

You Might Also Like

Proposition 50 voter guide
California Prop 50: Partisan Power Play or Necessary Counterpunch?
November 4 marks a special election for what has become the most controversial ballot measure in California in recent memory: Proposition 50, which would circumvent congressional districts drawn by the state’s independent redistricting commission for a legislative-drawn map....
01 Oct, 2025
-
9 min read
court gavel.
Virtual Discussion: The Fight for Equal Independent Voting Rights Makes it to SCOTUS
Every major voting rights movement in U.S. history – whether successful or not – has intertwined with landmark litigation. This was the case for women’s suffrage. It was the case for civil rights. And it is the case in the ongoing effort to protect the right of all voters to have equal participation in taxpayer-funded elections – something millions of independent voters are denied across the U.S....
29 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read
Supreme Court building
SCOTUS Considers Challenge to Closed Primaries -- Here's Why It Is Such a Big Deal
In a dramatic step forward for litigation challenging closed primaries, the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated they are going to conference to discuss whether to grant a writ of certiorari to Polelle v. Florida Secretary of State; a case challenging Florida's closed primaries that Open Primaries has supported since its inception....
26 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read