Gov Jesse Ventura: Gary Johnson Should Be Allowed to Debate
By W. E. Messamore | 09/28/2012 | Elections 2012, Headline, President | 35 Comments
Photo: Wikimedia Commons / Author: Cory Barnes
In a new ad released Wednesday by the Libertarian Action Super PAC, former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura urged voters to call the Commission on Presidential Debates to say that they want to see Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson in the presidential debates:
“Gary Johnson, the former governor of New Mexico, is running for president with the Libertarian Party, and he will be on the ballot in almost all fifty states.
Isn’t it time that we allowed a credible third party candidate into our presidential debates to tell Obama and Romney when they’re wrong? Call the Commission on Presidential Debates today, and tell them you want to see Gary Johnson in the presidential debates, because if this is still a country based on freedom, we shouldn’t limit our freedom of choice.”
View the full video of the Jesse Ventura Gary Johnson ad below:
Ventura, who has had a colorful career as a Navy SEAL veteran serving in the Philippines during the Vietnam conflict, Hollywood actor, and professional wrestler in the WWF, also served as governor of Minnesota from 1999 to 2003. He won his third party bid for governor– as the Reform Party candidate– through a combination of aggressive grassroots activism and television ads using the slogan, “Don’t vote for politics as usual.”
The former governor credits his access to the televised gubernatorial debates, however, as the decisive factor in his win. In an audience panel interview hosted by CNN’s Piers Morgan earlier this month, when an audience member asked Ventura about his thoughts on running for president, Ventura answered:
“I need to have ballot access in all fifty states, and I need some type of guarantee that I will be allowed in the debates, because you cannot win if they won’t let you debate, but if you can debate, you can win, because in Minnesota at the primary, I was only polling between eight to ten percent, and I was allowed in the debates. Seven weeks later, I was the governor of Minnesota.
You know they always say, Piers, in the private sector, competition’s good, right? Isn’t that what we always hear? Well how come competition isn’t good for president? Why has it been twenty years since we’ve seen any third voice in a presidential debate? Because these two parties– they make the rules, and they will not let anyone else win. So I would require huge help from you, the people, because if I do run and I run to win, I would be the first president elected in this country that would belong to no political party since George Washington.”
In the LASPAC ad Wednesday, Ventura said:
“When I first started running for governor of Minnesota in 1998, I was polling at only eight percent, however, after I appeared in televised debates, that percentage skyrocketed, because voters saw that I was able to challenge Republicans and Democrats when they were both wrong.”
In a June CNN interview promoting his new book, Jesse Ventura endorsed Gary Johnson for president in a segment that was edited out of the interview before CNN published it online:
“If people truly want to rebel this year, then vote for Gary Johnson, the former governor of New Mexico who’s running with the Libertarians, who won’t get any press coverage because mainstream media is also owned by the corporations.”
Ventura is certainly an independent voice in public policy, who levels criticism at both parties and identifies uncritical partisanship as one of the primary causes of public policy dysfunction, but in contrast to the more positive, policy-focused, solutions-oriented tone Gary Johnson strikes, the former Minnesota governor has a reputation for advancing his ideas with a heated, bruising, polemical style of political rhetoric.
Gary Johnson filed an anti-trust lawsuit last Friday, along with his running mate, Judge Jim Gray, against the Commission on Presidential Debates, the DNC, and the RNC, claiming that they are colluding in violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act to exclude the Libertarian Party ticket from the presidential debates, despite the electoral viability of the ticket, which will be on the November ballot in forty-seven states.





Leave Your Comment →
35 Comments
Mareike Lucht
09.28.2012
@malu
a country that big in size and population needs representation that reflects its diversity – and competition is the way to go. As it is in the private sector, where the consumer decides which product will dominate, elections should be somewhat handled the same way.
Ian Dawes
09.28.2012
@iandawes
I agree that equal representation in the Presidential debates will attempt to neutralize the partisan polarization, hopefully, at the polls. The voter as a consumer? Not sure I agree with that idea though.
Lucas Eaves
09.28.2012
@lucaseaves
Exactly like Mr. Ventura said, its after being on TV debates that an interesting candidate can rise in the polls. But to be on the presidential debate, you need already15% support in the polls. It is the political version of the chicken or egg dilemma.
W. E. Messamore
09.28.2012
@W__E__Messamore
Or the Catch 22.
Mike Moore
09.29.2012
Or the big 2 Political machines that don’t want any competition.
Matt Metzner
09.28.2012
@mmetzner
I always enjoy reminding myself that Jesse Venture started his political career as a WWF wrestler.
W. E. Messamore
09.28.2012
@W__E__Messamore
If you want some major entertainment, watch Running Man (1987) starring Arnold Schwarzenegger. Another main character (the bad guy) is played by Jesse Ventura. The whole time I was watching it I couldn’t stop being blown away by the fact that two of the main actors in it would go on to become governors of US states. I wonder if that’s ever happened before or after for a movie. It’s a sort of sci-fi, dystopian, thriller, btw, with a lot of political and societal commentary, making the gubernatorial acting talent even more interesting.
Alex Gauthier
09.28.2012
@alexg
Ventura is possibly the most recognized third party success story. His support for Johnson should make some waves.
W. E. Messamore
09.28.2012
@W__E__Messamore
I wonder why we haven’t heard anything from Ross Perot.
Walt O'Brien
09.29.2012
Yes.
Danny Nicholas
09.29.2012
The MSM is too busy thinking up questions to make Romney look foolish; they don’t have time to work on Johnson too.
David Hirtle
09.29.2012
Jesse is actually a very intelligent person. I wish he would run! It would be a great debate. He is wonderful!
Vanessa Duve
09.29.2012
love him
Marty Susman
09.29.2012
Yes & NO, since the whole concept we now have in DC is based on tw parties, sadly they are BOTH BOUGHT & PAID FOR so when it comes to doing for the people, they don’t, they do for themselves…. The whole present system of government might have been great in 1776 but today it is lost in the vast flows of money.
Var Enyo
09.29.2012
They won’t have to try very hard Danny and now he wants his mommy next to him. Of course the other parties should be able to debate. We need more types of representation.
David Yarbrough
09.29.2012
hell yeah
Edward Theilmann
09.29.2012
When one is perpetrating a fraud you don’t want to debate with people who are telling the truth.It can make you look bad
Carles Antonio Ximénes
09.29.2012
Yeah. We need more parties on the floor debating. The two horse race is far from being a democratic republic. Power needs to be given to the hands of as many people as possible, not to the few.
Brittany Prichard
09.29.2012
Yes. If you’re on the ballot, you should be in the debates. Plain and simple.
L Dean Latham
09.29.2012
They should ALL be allowed to debate!
Bob Rees
09.29.2012
I would agree!!
William Waugh
09.29.2012
Yes.
Alan Prokop
09.29.2012
Yes ! I love Gov. Johnson. Accept some of his young gun Libertarians are complete idiots. Call me Gary.
Carolyn Bare Tabailloux
09.29.2012
Yes they should.
Trevor Tenpenny
09.29.2012
Agree with the argument, but not sure about candidate.
Brian McAvoy
09.29.2012
Every party’s candidate should be allowed into the debate. It will help raise awareness to the verity of candidates and thus increase competition for the presidency.
Judy Ferro
09.29.2012
They have put the bar for a “credible” candidate at 15% in polling. Ross Poirot is the only one who has ever made it.
Jane Arcuri
09.29.2012
Is Jesse still living in Mexico???
Nanson Hwa
09.29.2012
Let American politics get out of this two party habit and give another opportunity to debate so we can hear issues from another perspective.
Casey Jones
09.30.2012
When you listen to what Ventura has to say … like it or not he makes a lot of very good points .
Scot Douglas
09.30.2012
There are no credible third party candidates
Brandon Magoon
09.30.2012
Scott, The best qualified candidate for office based just on job experience this year isn’t Obama or Romney, it’s Libertarian Gary Johnson. Unlike his opponents, Gov. Johnson has been reelected to an executive branch office, he has a better economic record then they do, as Governor of New Mexico, Johnson has foreign policy experience that Romney lacks and unlike both of his opponents, he has experience as a business owner. It is long past time we had some real debates in this country. To do any less would be an insult and a fraud on the American people.
Shannon Drinkwine Covel
09.30.2012
Right Scot, not a single one of the dozens out there are credible, unlike the two party candidate who are oh so credible.
Yes, if they are enough ballots to mathematically have a chance, they should be on stage.
William Braman
09.30.2012
would like to give somebody with no affiliation a try i’m sick of parties all kinds
Wayne Alexander
09.30.2012
Agreed!!!!