Gary Johnson: The Parties Are Violating Anti-Trust Law
By W. E. Messamore on 09/23/2012 in 2012, anti-trust, commission on presidential debates, DNC, gary johnson, gary johnson anti-trust lawsuit, gary johnson lawsuit, libertarian, Libertarian Party, presidential debates, presidential election, RNC, third parties with 49 CommentsRead Time: 4 - 6 minutes
Gary Johnson filed a federal anti-trust lawsuit Friday in California’s central district court against the Commission on Presidential Debates for excluding the Libertarian Party presidential candidate from the three presidential debates scheduled for next month prior to the November general election.
The Libertarian Party ticket’s vice presidential candidate, Jim Gray, a retired California Superior Court judge and a plaintiff in the case, will argue the motion on the campaign’s behalf.
Ballot Access News reports:
“The case is assigned to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, a Bush Jr. appointee. He has only had one previous case involving a minor party. He heard Libertarian Party of Los Angeles County v Bowen, a case against California’s restriction on out-of-district petitioners. In that case, he ruled that because the Secretary of State says she doesn’t enforce the law, therefore the plaintiffs lack standing to sue to overturn it. The Ninth Circuit took a somewhat different view, sending the case to arbirtration [sic] and signaling that if the arbitration doesn’t result in significant changes in state policy, the law will be held unconstitutional.”
The Commission on Presidential Debates announced Friday that only the Democratic and Republican presidential tickets have satisfied its criteria for inclusion in the nationally-televised debates next month:
“Pursuant to the criteria, which were publicly announced on October 31, 2011, those candidates qualify for debate participation who (1) are constitutionally eligible to hold the office of President of the United States; (2) have achieved ballot access in a sufficient number of states to win a theoretical Electoral College majority in the general election; and (3) have demonstrated a level of support of at least 15 percent of the national electorate, as determined by five selected national public opinion polling organizations, using the average of those organizations’ most recent publicly-reported results.”
Gary Johnson Files Anti-Trust Lawsuit
In an unexpected, and– some commentators have said– unprecedented legal maneuver, the Gary Johnson campaign is suing the Commission on Presidential Debates, the Democratic National Committee, and the Republican National Committee on anti-trust grounds, alleging that the three private organizations have conspired in violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act to limit competition, causing material injury to the American electorate and the Gary Johnson campaign.
The Commission on Presidential Debates is a private, non-profit organization founded in 1987 by the Republican and Democratic parties. Part of the Johnson campaign’s argument is that the Libertarian Party ticket will be on the November ballot in forty-seven states, enough to conceivably secure the 270 electoral college votes necessary to win the presidential election. The campaign accuses the CPD and the two national party committees of illegal collusion to exclude it from the presidential debates.
In a press release from the campaign, Johnson advisor Ron Nielson said:
“There is nothing remotely surprising in the fact that a private organization created by and run by the Republican and Democratic Parties has only invited the Republican and Democratic candidates to their debates. It is a bit more disturbing that the national news media has chosen to play the two-party game, when a full one-third of the American people do not necessarily identify with either of those two parties…
Someone has to stand up and call this what it is: A rigged system designed entirely to protect and perpetuate the two-party duopoly.”
The last presidential candidate to share the debate stage with the Republican and Democratic nominees was independent candidate Ross Perot in 1992, who received 18.9% of the popular vote on election day. He later went on to found the Reform Party and ran for president again on the Reform Party ticket in 1996.
The full document containing Gary Johnson’s anti-trust suit can be read below:






Leave Your Comment →
49 Comments
Debbie
09.23.2012
It’s about time someone took legal action against the corrupt 2-party system.
CTownNick
09.23.2012
I applaud his stand and look forward to seeing at the debates!
Ryan Kiplinger
09.24.2012
Of course. America needs to realize that there are more than two options.
Tim Ananda
09.24.2012
YES !!!
the mechanism is IN PLACE
so, instead of pissing in everyone’s EAR, he’s doing something useful (smart!)
Michael Snider
09.24.2012
Johnson should be allowed to participate. Jill Stein also.
Maureen McCartan Harris
09.24.2012
Gary Johnson and Ron paul need to pack up and go home.A vote for either of them is a vote for Obama
Chavis
09.24.2012
You need to get used to the fact that a bit of fair and civil action within your party could have led to a revitalized voter base and a return to the values that used to be core to the Republican party, and it would have led to your success.
Wrap your head around the fact that you’re going to lose this race because you shot yourself in the leg.
Rob
09.24.2012
Why should they pack up? Obviously the 2 party system isn’t working for this country. Only in politics do we choose one of 2 evils, whereas in the rest of life we demand better.
Jon
09.24.2012
Seriously? If I didn’t vote for Ron or Gary my vote would go for Obama. That whole if you vote for this you lose that argument is complete utter bs. You not realizing that yourself just goes to show why we will never be free of this corrupted system. Your type is too easily swayed, scared into voting for whoever they tell you too. Tool.
Michael Mallon
09.24.2012
If you’re on the ballot in more than half the states you should be able to participate in the debates. Airing debates all season for every party before they nominate candidates would also be ideal.
KB71
09.24.2012
Seeing how Gary Johnson is already on the ballot in 47 states (the establish parties are legally challenging the other three states…) he should be in the debate. Johnson is the first “third party” candidate in generations to appear on all 50 state ballots. Who says he isn’t viable?
Carol Cantara Palmer
09.24.2012
Absolutely
Jeff Willis
09.24.2012
they need to let everyone thats running for whatever party should be allow to participate
Ray Yukich
09.24.2012
Yes, but then the word “Afghanistan” might come up…..
Wes Alderson
09.24.2012
Yes.
MaryLee Belleville
09.24.2012
Regardless on what happens this election cycle, we really need to focus on returning the debates to the League of Women Voter’s. Under their historical criteria, both Stein and Johnson would be included
Todd Vickers
09.24.2012
One of the few things Republicans and Democrats agree on, is that they don’t want any other parties to have a voice.
Jonathan Tubbs
09.24.2012
Johnson 2012!!!!!
Phillip Barela
09.24.2012
Isn’t there specific criteria in terms of poll numbers you have to meet to be included? Johnson couldn’t make all the republican debates because he didn’t have the poll numbers and now he wants the courts to intervene because he thinks his lack of popularity across two different parties isn’t fair. Give me a break.
MD Teacher
09.23.2012
Hi Philip, the reason GJ has not received the required %15 in polling is, because until a week or two ago, he wasn’t even included in these polls.
Thomas Mohney
09.24.2012
He was not included in the poles
Dan Adams
09.24.2012
No matter what you think or who you are going to vote for, we as Americans are entitled to hear from ALL the candidates. That is the true American spirit. What you need to ask yourself is why the two major parties don’t what him to debate?
Carol Cantara Palmer
09.24.2012
I say Americans develop a backbone and end the two party system. Sooner or later people will wake up.
Kalab
10.01.2012
Yea people will wake up once our economy crashes and a new party emerges called ” THE BROKE AMERICAN PARTY”
Roger Buck
09.24.2012
Give anyone who you think would make a better president as much of your time as possible, but in November it will be Mittens Romney and Barack Obama..then we cannot let the GOP feed the rich and destroy the poor in this country! The argument of the lesser of 2 evils, certainly sounds valid, but in the finality, we have to support Obama.
Chavis
09.24.2012
No, we don’t.
John Burkett
09.24.2012
Yes… he should be given the opportunity to state his position on major issues facing our nation and what his policies would be, if elected. Maybe the Dems and GOP would learn something about limited government and respecting the liberty of the citizens of this great nation.
Stormy Leigh
09.24.2012
He has all the signatures. Him not being allowed in Republican debates had to do with him not being a republican not his popularity.
Lana Gail Osborne Dearing
09.24.2012
Absolutely
Stormy Leigh
09.24.2012
So, Obama has multi million dollar sponsers, hands the insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies huge checks, and bails out all of his friends with tax payer money and people still think its just the Republicans sticking it to the little man? Unbelievable.
Jackie Vines
09.24.2012
Maureen I will vote for RON PAUL it is not a vote for Obama or
Jackie Vines
09.24.2012
Romney
Peg Wright
09.24.2012
he’s a candidate for Gods sake… its only fair !
Nathan McIntyre
09.24.2012
That 15% threshold was instituted in 2000 specifically to hamper the efforts of third parties after the somewhat successful run of Ross Perot and the potential threat posed by guys like Ralph Nader. Johnson’s not whining, he’s suing a rigged system.
John Dube'
09.24.2012
Phillip, how about you do some research. The 2 parties are using every loophole to exclude any candidate, they did it to Ron Paul and they are doing it to Gary Johnson in 3 states in ballot access.
If the lamestream media which is controlled by big banks and globalists would actually do some “fair and balanced” reporting, Gary Johnson would be more known thus he would poll higher. Plus the pollsters are ordered to poll with the only choices being Obama and Romney!
Klaus-Dieter Hinck
09.24.2012
@Klaus-Dieter Hinck
Good to see this legal approch than. Much needed and much needed now – hope media will get this case into their news. As it might work virally.
Ian Dawes
09.24.2012
@iandawes
This is a step forward in breaking down the two party system. If Johnson wins this lawsuit, the course of future presidential elections and debates could actually produce a fair race. I wonder what the League of Women Voters has to say about this?
Mareike Lucht
09.24.2012
@malu
a brave undertaking…. an antitrust injunction is a heavy weight and always difficult to obtain ….a realistic approach is to hope for the best but to expect the worst…. there is, however, no reason to celebrate just yet
brandon
09.24.2012
This is fantastic! I really hope it goes through. There is no sensible reason to exclude a presidential candidate from the ballot unless the two major parties were purposely conspiring to create a duopoly. This is a completely valid argument and I hope that this sets the record straight PERMANENTLY!
Steve
09.24.2012
I’m starting to like Gary Johnson more and more.
Scott
09.24.2012
It’s not suprising that he took this action. I fully support Gov. Gary Johnson’s decision to stick it to the rigged system we have today. We need the freedom and the ability to vote for those we believe in, not just those with the deepest pockets controlling the media. Politics today is such a game. It’s not about doing the right thing anymore, and Gary Johnson is speaking up!!! Way to go, Johnson!
Steve
09.24.2012
It’s time to get rid of this 2 party system. Both candidates suck and I will not vote for either of them regardless if Gary Johnson gets invited to the debates or not.
Taylor
09.24.2012
Beginning of the end of the two party system?! Fingers crossed.
Chad Peace
09.24.2012
@Chad_Peace
This really is a brilliant move, both legally and politically. Genius :)
JadeQueen
09.24.2012
I say somebody should run an interesting debate:
Gary Johnson v. Jill Stein v. Roseanne Barr
Everybody could watch the interesting debate and skip the bankers on holiday, boring debate.
Butch DeSherlia
09.25.2012
Corrupt is the word, all they think about is the party, not the people. Maybe they just flip coins to see who”s the winner. How would we know? They are all millionaires anyway.
Lloyd Langsdorf
09.25.2012
Folks,
Another sad commentary on “I’ve got mine and the heck with you”. The Dem and Republicans obviously want a two party only race. When is America going to wake up and sweep out both of these do nothing partys?
Jay
09.30.2012
Good! Go after those petty bastards Gary!
John Smith
10.04.2012
Most times justice has to be served not waited upon until it decides it will be permitted. Real justice almost never works this way. It more often has to be fought for and challenged. We have waited long enough for other voices to be welcomed into the debate. Blow the door down.