How Amendment V Fixes South Dakota's Broken Elections

How Amendment V Fixes South Dakota's Broken Elections
Published: 02 Nov, 2016
2 min read

Amendment V is modeled on the Nebraska system, that is among the most competitive in U.S.

Most voters would like to believe that their votes on Tuesday will decide the outcome of state legislative races. Unfortunately, they’re wrong. According to a recent study, 92% of state legislative elections were actually decided in the June 7 primary, with only 8% to be decided in the general election.

Joe Kirby, a Republican supporter of Amendment V, says that locks out most voters:

“Most of our elections are decided in the closed Republican primary, which locks out independents and Democrats, and a handful in Democratic primaries which lock out some Republicans. Very few South Dakotans cast a meaningful vote for the people who are supposed to represent them. That’s wrong.” - Joe Kirby

Legislators’ lack of accountability to voters creates an environment ripe for scandals like EB-5 and GEAR UP, says Kirby.

“It’s not a complicated concept. If the politicians aren’t accountable to the voters, that begins to trickle down into all facets of government. When it goes on long enough, then you get these kinds of scandals,” Kirby states.

For a solution, Kirby’s group modeled Amendment V on Nebraska’s nonpartisan, open primary for the state's legislature. Since 1934, Nebraska’s system has placed all legislative candidates on the ballot without party affiliation, and allowed all voters to vote for the person, not the party. The top two candidates move on to the general election.

Nebraska is rated as having some of the most competitive legislative elections in the country, the highest legislative approval rating (62% vs 36% for South Dakota), and allows all voters to participate. Kirby says, “Nebraska has figured out how to give power to the voters, rather than the establishment. We think South Dakota deserves that too.”

While South Dakota is one of the least competitive states in the country, partisan primaries decide about 85% of elections nationally.

“When voters say they’re angry because they feel like the politicians aren’t accountable to them, they’re absolutely right. This is why politicians pander to party leadership instead of representing ordinary voters,” says Kirby.

If Amendment V wins Tuesday, Kirby sees it as a way to fix national politics:

IVP Donate

“The first step is winning in South Dakota. With all the national coverage and interest we’ve gotten, this can be the spark that ignites a movement. South Dakota has a chance to fix America’s broken politics.” - Joe Kirby

Amendment V has been endorsed by AARP South Dakota, the League of Women Voters of South Dakota, the Rapid City Journal, the Mitchell Daily Republic, the Watertown Public Opinion, and a diverse group of prominent Republicans, Democrats, and independents from across South Dakota.

Promotions for this article paid for by Yes on V – South Dakotans for Nonpartisan Elections

Photo Credit: Nagel Photography / shutterstock.com

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read