Why Rand Paul Calls Trump's Tariffs a Harmful Tax on Americans

Rand Paul
Photo by Gage Skidmore on Flickr. Creative commons license.
Shawn GriffithsShawn Griffiths
Published: 03 Apr, 2025
2 min read

Washington, D.C. – Republican Senator Rand Paul has once again voiced his strong opposition to tariffs imposed by former President Donald Trump and has joined a handful of Republicans willing to vote against them in the Senate.

Paul, a staunch libertarian and advocate for free markets, argues that tariffs lead to higher prices, disrupt economic growth, and provoke retaliatory measures from trade partners.

Fundamentally, he argues, they act as an additional tax on the American people. 

“A tariff is simply a tax, and the people who pay it are American consumers,” Paul stated in a 2018 interview. “Taxing trade will mean less trade and higher prices.” His position hasn't changed in the 7 years since.

One of Paul’s primary concerns has been the impact of tariffs on American farmers and manufacturers. Not only do tariffs hurt these groups, but the government ends up having to provide financial aid to protect them.

For example, in 2018 and 2019, the Trump administration imposed tariffs on Chinese goods. The Chinese retaliated with its own tariffs, including on US agricultural exports like soybeans, pork, and dairy.

The US Department of Agriculture then created the Market Facilitation Program. Under this program, the federal government provided over $28 billion in aid to farmers between 2018 and 2020.

“If tariffs punish farmers, the answer is not welfare for farmers—the answer is remove the tariffs,” Paul said

There is more to Paul's position than economic concerns. He also believes that the executive branch has long overreached on trade policy and has pushed for Congress to reclaim its authority over tariffs.

IVP Donate

Further, he doesn't believe the government should impose on a free market. 

“I don’t think we should be in the business of picking winners and losers in the marketplace,” Paul stated. “Trade should be driven by the decisions of individuals and businesses, not by government mandates.”

The Trump administration defends tariffs as a means to counter unfair trade practices. The president also says the newly imposed tariffs "give us great power to negotiate" if countries make a "phenomenal" offer.

Paul, however, asserts that it is an "economic fallacy that they help us."

He and other free-market conservatives argue that the unintended consequences — such as increased costs for businesses reliant on imported goods — far outweigh the benefits.

In this article

You Might Also Like

Proposition 50 voter guide
California Prop 50: Partisan Power Play or Necessary Counterpunch?
November 4 marks a special election for what has become the most controversial ballot measure in California in recent memory: Proposition 50, which would circumvent congressional districts drawn by the state’s independent redistricting commission for a legislative-drawn map....
01 Oct, 2025
-
9 min read
court gavel.
Virtual Discussion: The Fight for Equal Independent Voting Rights Makes it to SCOTUS
Every major voting rights movement in U.S. history – whether successful or not – has intertwined with landmark litigation. This was the case for women’s suffrage. It was the case for civil rights. And it is the case in the ongoing effort to protect the right of all voters to have equal participation in taxpayer-funded elections – something millions of independent voters are denied across the U.S....
29 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read
Supreme Court building
SCOTUS Considers Challenge to Closed Primaries -- Here's Why It Is Such a Big Deal
In a dramatic step forward for litigation challenging closed primaries, the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated they are going to conference to discuss whether to grant a writ of certiorari to Polelle v. Florida Secretary of State; a case challenging Florida's closed primaries that Open Primaries has supported since its inception....
26 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read