Who Wins a Trade War? Not Independent Voters

A trade port with ships and cranes.
Photo by Kurt Cotoaga on Unsplash
Published: 24 Mar, 2025
3 min read

Editor's Note: This piece originally appeared on The Independent Center's website and has been republished on IVN with permission from the organization.

 

Trade wars, often fueled by protectionist policies and tariffs, have historically led to economic and geopolitical instability. The notion that trade wars are easy to win is not only misleading but dangerous. Protective tariffs result in increased consumer prices, weaken domestic manufacturing competitiveness, and provoke retaliatory actions from trade partners. These effects collectively harm both national and global economies. Furthermore, history has demonstrated that trade disputes can escalate beyond economics, fostering diplomatic tensions and even contribute to armed conflicts.

Key points:

  • Foreign nations retaliate with their own tariffs.
  • Trade wars can evolve into diplomatic crises or military conflicts.

Zooming In

Historical Lessons from the 20th Century:

  • The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 worsened global economic conditions.
  • Protectionist policies in the early 20th century exacerbated international tensions leading up to World War II.
  • Post-war leaders recognized the dangers of trade barriers and laid the groundwork for global trade institutions like the World Trade Organization (WTO).

The Economic Downside of Tariffs:

  • Tariffs increase costs for domestic manufacturers reliant on foreign raw materials.
  • They strengthen the domestic currency, making exports more expensive and less competitive.
  • Inflationary expectations drive up consumer prices as businesses anticipate higher costs.

Free Trade's Benefits and Challenges:

  • Free trade generates widespread economic benefits but also creates localized economic disruptions.
  • The rise of global supply chains has made trade restrictions even riskier in modern times.

Why It Matters

Trade policy affects everyday lives, influencing the price of goods, job availability, and economic growth. Understanding the ramifications of tariffs and trade wars is crucial for voters and policymakers alike.

  • The interconnected nature of today’s economy means that a trade war impacts not just one country but the entire global market.
  • History has repeatedly shown that protectionism can lead to greater instability rather than prosperity.
  • Current economic structures, such as retirement investments tied to the stock market, mean that protectionist policies can directly impact citizens’ financial security.

Moreover, trade disputes can damage diplomatic relations. As seen in the past, economic conflicts have led to resentment and political instability, contributing to broader international conflicts. Ensuring a balanced trade policy helps maintain global stability and economic growth.

Independent Lens

When it comes to trade policy, independent voters want pragmatic, fact-based policy rather than ideological extremes. Independent voters propelled the GOP to power in November because they were viewed as more sound on the key issues of affordability and inflation.

By focusing on long-term economic stability and sound leadership, rather than short-term political victory, an independent approach seeks sustainable solutions that benefit both businesses and workers. Avoiding reactionary trade policies and instead fostering collaboration on fair trade practices will help prevent the historical pitfalls of past trade wars.

History and economic analysis show that trade wars are not easily won and often inflict more harm than benefit. Often, raising tariffs is like shooting your own foot. Smart, independent policy-making can help avoid the worst consequences while ensuring that global trade remains a force for prosperity rather than conflict.  

IVP Donate

You Might Also Like

People shopping
Are Independent Voters Prepared to Ride Out Tariff Uncertainty?
For millions of independent voters, short-term pain isn’t just uncomfortable—it’s unsustainable....
07 May, 2025
-
2 min read
Person holding up a cannabis plant.
On Top of New Tariffs and Proposed Vape Ban, Calif. Cannabis Retailers Also Face an Excise Tax Hike
As California’s legal cannabis industry heads into the second half of 2025, store owners are facing a combination of rising costs that could further disadvantage them against the state’s still-thriving illicit market....
16 Apr, 2025
-
3 min read
Cargo ship and harbor with a picture of the globe in the water.
Trump's Trade War: When Bad Economics Makes Good Politics
Last week, Americans witnessed President Trump's "art of the deal" in action as his administration imposed sweeping tariffs on global trading partners, only to roll them back after markets cratered and bond yields spiked....
14 Apr, 2025
-
1 min read
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read