The Fight Against The Rigged Presidential Debates Continues

image
Published: 24 Apr, 2019
Updated: 15 Aug, 2022
2 min read

US voters have overwhelmingly said they want a third candidate in presidential debates. As we look ahead to 2020, it seems the bipartisan Commission on Presidential Debates will once again deny them the opportunity.

IVN contributor Wes Messamore and I go into the history of the debate commission, which has made it all but impossible for candidates outside the Republican and Democratic Parties to appear on the public stage -- all in the self-serving interest of protecting the major party nominees.

The discussion comes on the heels of a district court decision that dismissed a lawsuit against the FEC, the federal agency charged with administrative oversight over the Commission on Presidential Debates. Plaintiffs in the lawsuit say the FEC is willfully ignoring a mountain of evidence that the debate commission is violating federal law with debate entry criteria that make it impossible for a third candidate to appear on the stage.

“We are extremely disappointed with the district court’s decision and plan to appeal," said Peter Ackerman, plaintiff in Level The Playing Field, et. al. v. FEC.

"The health of our democracy depends on robust competition, which is being unfairly stifled by the two major parties through the Commission on Presidential Debates and the Federal Election Commission. The current debate rule discriminates against candidates who are unaffiliated with the Democratic and Republican parties. No independent can realistically compete for president without this rule changing. There are many other possible rules that would be more democratic, more accurate, fairer and more competitive than what we have now, but the CPD refuses to consider them, and the FEC enables their collusive, anticompetitive practices. 72% of the American people think it is important for an independent or third party candidate to participate in the presidential debates, and we intend to continue our efforts to help make that possible.”

Wes and I discuss the implications of the lawsuit as well as the potential appeal. Stay tuned for an in-depth story on IVN.us on the full history behind the debate lawsuit and the rigged debate rules.

Thanks for listening, and as always... stay independent.

Latest articles

Wall St. sign.
Americans Want Congress to Stop Playing the Market — So Why Won’t Lawmakers Listen?
Americans have spoken, again and again — and the message is crystal clear: members of Congress should not be allowed to trade stocks while in office. Yet, despite bipartisan legislative proposals and national scrutiny, Congress continues to stall....
05 Aug, 2025
-
3 min read
stacks of cash.
From Relief to Rage: $100M FireAid Concert Engulfed in Political Scandal
LOS ANGELES, CA – It seems we can’t even have a $100 million benefit concert without inviting partis...
05 Aug, 2025
-
10 min read
One hand holding a blue California and another holding a red Texas in front of the US Capitol Building.
The Redistricting War Is Here — One CA Republican Says It’s Time to Call It Off
Texas Republicans have threatened to redraw their maps to protect their party’s majority in Congress. California Democrats have, in turn, threatened to respond with their own mid-decade redistricting to “fight fire with fire.”...
05 Aug, 2025
-
4 min read