The Fight Against The Rigged Presidential Debates Continues

image
Created: 24 Apr, 2019
Updated: 15 Aug, 2022
2 min read

US voters have overwhelmingly said they want a third candidate in presidential debates. As we look ahead to 2020, it seems the bipartisan Commission on Presidential Debates will once again deny them the opportunity.

IVN contributor Wes Messamore and I go into the history of the debate commission, which has made it all but impossible for candidates outside the Republican and Democratic Parties to appear on the public stage -- all in the self-serving interest of protecting the major party nominees.

The discussion comes on the heels of a district court decision that dismissed a lawsuit against the FEC, the federal agency charged with administrative oversight over the Commission on Presidential Debates. Plaintiffs in the lawsuit say the FEC is willfully ignoring a mountain of evidence that the debate commission is violating federal law with debate entry criteria that make it impossible for a third candidate to appear on the stage.

“We are extremely disappointed with the district court’s decision and plan to appeal," said Peter Ackerman, plaintiff in Level The Playing Field, et. al. v. FEC.

"The health of our democracy depends on robust competition, which is being unfairly stifled by the two major parties through the Commission on Presidential Debates and the Federal Election Commission. The current debate rule discriminates against candidates who are unaffiliated with the Democratic and Republican parties. No independent can realistically compete for president without this rule changing. There are many other possible rules that would be more democratic, more accurate, fairer and more competitive than what we have now, but the CPD refuses to consider them, and the FEC enables their collusive, anticompetitive practices. 72% of the American people think it is important for an independent or third party candidate to participate in the presidential debates, and we intend to continue our efforts to help make that possible.”

Wes and I discuss the implications of the lawsuit as well as the potential appeal. Stay tuned for an in-depth story on IVN.us on the full history behind the debate lawsuit and the rigged debate rules.

Thanks for listening, and as always... stay independent.

Latest articles

Building with columns.
In 3 States, Partisans Pick the Secretary of State Without Voter or Executive Input
In 47 US states, the secretary of state is a recognized statewide office, and in most of those states, voters get to decide who holds it. But in three 3 states — Maine, Tennessee, and New Hampshire — the legislature holds that power exclusively....
29 Apr, 2025
-
7 min read
A man wearing an I Voted sticker on a collared shirt.
Charlottesville's First Use of Ranked Choice Voting is Unique -- Here's Why
Primary elections are scheduled in Charlottesville, Virginia, on June 17. However, there is something different about this election: It is the first time the city will use ranked choice voting (RCV). ...
29 Apr, 2025
-
4 min read
ballots in ballot box.
Congressmen Co-Lead Effort to Prohibit Ranked Choice Voting in Federal Elections
US Rep. Nick Begich (R-Alaska), who was elected under Alaska’s ranked choice voting (RCV) system, and US Rep. Abraham Hamadeh (R-Arizona) are co-leading an effort to prohibit the use of RCV in federal elections. ...
29 Apr, 2025
-
2 min read