Skip to content
Subscribe

The Citizen Ballot Initiative Process Is Under Attack

Published:

The ballot measure process has been critical to the success of nonpartisan reforms across the country. However, according to new research by RepresentUs, 11 states have proposed over 60 laws to make it harder for citizens to have a direct say in the way their state’s political process works.

Citizens have used ballot initiatives to approve independent redistricting commissions, primary reform, new voting methods, anti-corruption laws and more. It has been the single greatest tool to challenge the two-party duopoly.

“Having the freedom to propose laws by ballot initiative is a key feature of our democracy,” says RepresentUs CEO Joshua Graham Lynn.

“When politicians forget who’s really in charge and drag their feet on a popular issue, American voters should have the option to take matters into their own hands.”

The advancement of citizen-led reform is already limited by the fact that nearly half of US states do not allow ballot referendums. The progress of reform, however, may be hindered more if state lawmakers and special interest groups have their way.

According to RepresentUs, 64 bills have been proposed in 11 states since 2017 that would make it harder for voters to shape policy. These states include Arkansas, Arizona, Florida, Maine, Missouri, North Dakota, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, and Washington.

Florida has already made the ballot measure process more cumbersome for reform advocates across the political spectrum. In 2016, the state raised the threshold needed to pass a statewide initiative to 60% of the vote.

One consequence of this change is a 2020 nonpartisan top-two primary proposal for state executive and legislative elections failed despite getting 54% of the vote.

Increasing the threshold to pass a ballot measure is the most common proposal among the 11 states featured in RepresentUs’ report. According to the analysis, 8 states have considered bills that would raise the threshold to 60%.

“It’s not a surprise that those in power want to restrict [the ballot measure] process,” said Lynn. “While most of these efforts have failed, we have to remain vigilant.”

Attempts to change the ballot referendum process increased as anti-corruption and nonpartisan election reform initiatives were being considered or approved by voters in states like Missouri, where voters passed anti-corruption measures and redistricting reform in a single election. In fact, 29 of the legislative proposals found in RepresentUs’ analysis came from the Missouri Legislature.

There were several proposals in Missouri to increase the vote threshold to pass a ballot measure. There was also a proposal to require a certain percentage of registered voters to turn out for a ballot measure to pass.

A bill that proposed a two-thirds voter requirement came so close to passing that a filibuster in the Missouri Senate was needed to defeat it. It was the closest any of the identified proposals came to becoming law.

South Dakota voters also overwhelmingly voted down a ballot measure on the state’s June 7 primary ballot that would have placed additional restrictions on the ballot initiative process.

“At the end of the day, our government and its policies should reflect the will of the people,” Lynn stated. “Instead of spending their time strangling the voice of the people, perhaps it’s time states uphold it.”

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

The Citizen Ballot Initiative Process Is Under Attack

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us