Skip to content
Subscribe

Is Texas About to Be More Chill on Hemp Than California?

California has just proposed a sweeping new rule to permanently ban intoxicating hemp products — and Texas may soon follow, as Governor Greg Abbott (R) faces a June 22 deadline to sign or veto a similar bill.

Is Texas About to Be More Chill on Hemp Than California?
Photo by Getty Images on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by IVN Editor Shawn Griffiths.
Published:

California has just proposed a sweeping new rule to permanently ban intoxicating hemp products — and Texas may soon follow, as Governor Greg Abbott (R) faces a June 22 deadline to sign or veto a similar bill.

On June 13, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) published proposed rules that would formalize the state’s emergency ban by forbidding “detectable THC” in any hemp-derived food, beverage, or dietary supplement intended for human consumption.  These rules, expected to be finalized later this summer, would continue a policy that has already emptied store shelves of hemp-based THC products such as gummies and drinks.

California Governor Gavin Newsom (D) issued the emergency ban on September 6, 2024, after observing hemp-derived intoxicants being sold at a retail chain near his house. Newsom said the ban was necessary to protect California’s children from dangerous hemp products.

The new rule requires that industrial hemp food, beverage, and dietary products intended for human consumption have no detectable THC or other intoxicating cannabinoids per serving, create a minimum age to purchase hemp products of 21, and limit the number of servings of hemp products to five per package.

June 13 marked the beginning of a 45-day Public Comment Period on the rule that will conclude on July 28.

“We will not sit on our hands as drug peddlers target our children with dangerous and unregulated hemp products containing THC at our retail stores,” Newsom said when he proposed the emergency rule. “We’re taking action to close loopholes and increase enforcement to prevent children from accessing these dangerous hemp and cannabis products.”

Since November 2024, the prohibition has remained in effect, with near-total compliance among businesses, according to the state’s Alcoholic Beverage Control agency.

In February, IVN reported on a comprehensive investigation released in California that revealed that most so-called “hemp” products on the market today in that state are neither natural nor compliant with state or federal law.

The report, titled The Great Hemp Hoax, was conducted by Groundwork Holdings, Infinite Chemical Analysis Labs, the United Food and Commercial Workers Western States Council, and a licensed private investigator. Their findings were staggering: 95% of tested hemp products contained synthetic cannabinoids, even though such compounds are banned under California law.

These substances, often used in vapes and gummies marketed as “hemp,” can be up to 30 times more potent than naturally occurring THC and are associated with serious health risks, including seizures, psychosis, and even death.

Despite the legal threshold of 0.3 percent THC for hemp under federal law, over half the products tested exceeded that limit.

When held to California’s stricter “Total THC” standards, 88% of products failed. One so-called hemp gummy contained 325 milligrams of THC per serving—32 times the legal limit for cannabis edibles in the state. Vape products were even worse, with average THC levels more than double California’s adult-use cannabis limits.

The permanent ban in California will support the regulated cannabis market. It has been welcomed by segments of California’s licensed cannabis industry, which has long viewed hemp-derived THC as an unregulated competitor that skirts the high taxes and stringent testing requirements imposed on cannabis products.

IVN recently reported that Tennessee enacted its own restrictions in May, with a law that will severely limit the production and sale of intoxicating hemp products beginning in 2026.

Now, all eyes are on Texas.

On May 26, the Texas Senate gave final approval to Senate Bill 3 (SB3), which would ban the manufacture, sale, and possession of hemp-derived intoxicants. The bill now sits on Governor Abbott’s desk, and he must decide whether to sign or veto it by the end of this week.

SB3 would outlaw widely available compounds like delta-8 and THCA, and impose new licensing requirements and oversight for even non-intoxicating cannabinoids like CBD and CBG. A compromise amendment would expand the state’s medical cannabis program to include chronic pain, terminal illness, and hospice care — and allow for more licensed dispensaries.

“We are not banning hemp,” said Rep. Tom Oliverson (R-Cypress), who led the bill in the House. “We are banning high.”

The bill has strong support from Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick who has accused the unregulated hemp industry of wanting to “hook a generation of young people.”

As The New York Times reported, lobbyists opposed to the ban have bombarded Governor Abbott with messages urging a veto.

Update 6/23/2025: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott vetoed SB 3 on Sunday, June 22. He has called for a special session to get lawmakers to regulate intoxicating hemp products, not outright ban them.

California, Texas and Tennessee’s actions are part of a growing national push to address what federal lawmakers and state regulators have described as a gaping loophole in the 2018 Farm Bill, one that has enabled widespread sales of edibles and other psychoactive hemp products with little oversight

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Is Texas About to Be More Chill on Hemp Than California?

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us