Don't Let It Happen Again: California's Unconstitutional Presidential Primary

image
Created: 22 May, 2019
Updated: 14 Aug, 2022
2 min read

Imagine that California’s 4.7 million Republican and 8.6 million Democrat voters were not able to vote for a presidential candidate of their choice in March 2020.

And NO ONE seemed to care.

California’s 5.6 million NPP voters don’t have to imagine, because for the state's second-largest voting bloc by a wide margin, this IS their reality. Even though California’s constitution requires an “open presidential primary,” meaning every voter is supposed to be able to vote for whomever they want, they cannot.

This is a fundamental civil rights issue that contributes directly to the suppression of voter rights and magnification of partisanship.

The issue has the attention of state election officials. They are not only planning a massive education effort to ensure NPP voters are aware of the complicated primary election rules, but also calling on elected officials to adequately address the problem.

Movement Gains National Traction

A growing coalition of national and local organizations have signed on in support, including: The National Association of Nonpartisan Reformers (which represents more than 30 reform organizations), RepresentUs, Alliance San Diego Mobilization Fund, Open Primaries, FairVote, and many more.

These organizations span the ideological spectrum, but all agree that a voter’s right to participate in a taxpayer-funded election should not be subject to the control of any private political party. In fact, it is this First Amendment “right of non-association” the Supreme Court recognized in Democratic Party v. Jones to close California’s old “open blanket” primary.

“No voter should have to join a party or participate in a party’s private nomination process as a condition of exercising their fundamental right of vote in an important and taxpayer-funded election process," says Independent Voter Project legal advisor Chad Peace.

The Independent Voter Project has just launched a video to educate and activate the electorate. See above.

More Choice for San Diego

Latest articles

Man voting.
Maine Lawmakers Vote to Protect RCV Counting Process, Which Generates Results in 'One Minute'
On Monday, Maine's Veterans and Legal Affairs Committee voted 3-7 against restoring batch elimination to the ranked choice voting (RCV) system through LD 656 (HP 424), the title of which claims it will save taxpayers money, but the secretary of state says is unnecessary. ...
11 Mar, 2025
-
1 min read
Vote here signs outside a building.
To Avoid Confusion, Should RCV Just Be Called Instant Runoff Elections?
In discussions with an elderly voter in Colorado about Proposition 131, the unsuccessful 2024 ballot measure to create a nonpartisan primary with ranked choice voting (RCV), in the general election, we learned something important. This individual had voted against Proposition 131, casting his mail ballot on the day he received it. A week later, he received a campaign ad mailer that Colorado’s governor and Denver’s mayor had endorsed Proposition 131, which may have influenced his decision....
11 Mar, 2025
-
5 min read
Canada flag
Canada's Next Prime Minister Was Chosen Using Ranked Choice Voting
On March 9, the Liberal Party of Canada held an election to determine who will lead the party using a reform growing in popularity in cities across the US: ranked choice voting.  The winner of that election: Former Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney....
10 Mar, 2025
-
2 min read