DC Judge Tosses Lawsuit Against Open Primaries, Ranked Choice Voting Ballot Measure

DC
Photo Credit: Maria Oswalt on Unsplash
Shawn GriffithsShawn Griffiths
Published: 31 Mar, 2024
1 min read

Photo Credit: Maria Oswalt on Unsplash

 

A DC Superior Court tossed a lawsuit Thursday that attempted to block a ballot initiative that would open the District of Columbia's primary elections to independent voters and implement ranked choice voting in all city elections.

The lawsuit was filed by the DC Democratic Party in August not long after the DC Board of Elections unanimously said it was okay for the reform initiative, now known as Initiative 83, to appear on the 2024 ballot if it gets enough signatures.

Judge Carl E. Ross determined that the lawsuit was filed prematurely

Initiative 83, spearheaded by Make All Votes Count DC, would allow 16% of registered voters not affiliated with a political party to choose a party's ballot in the primary. This amounts to over 73,000 voters. 

Currently the city uses taxpayer-funded closed partisan primaries, which deny these voters a meaningful say in elections. With ranked choice voting added, the reform initiative takes a comprehensive approach to enacting better elections in the nation's capital.

Make All Votes Count DC needs to collect 30,000 signatures by July 8 to qualify for the November ballot. These signatures must be acquired from 5 of the city's 8 wards.

According to the campaign, it is now a third of the way to that goal

IVP Donate

“Voters are enthusiastically in support of our effort to achieve ballot access,” says Kris Furnish, Field Director and Steering Committee member for the initiative's campaign.

“I’ve seen firsthand when petition circulators mention ‘ranked choice voting,’ voters stop in their tracks, immediately turn around, and ask to sign the petition.”

The earliest the reforms would be implemented in city elections is 2026. This not only comes down to Initiative 83 being approved by voters, but any potential funding requirements being appropriated by the DC City Council.

You Might Also Like

Nevada Dems Block Independent Redistricting from Going before Voters – Again!
Nevada Dems Block Independent Redistricting from Going before Voters – Again!
With deep frustration, Vote Nevada PAC announced it is withdrawing its ballot initiative to create an independent redistricting commission -- a proposal meant to bring openness, accountability, and fairness to how Nevada’s political maps are drawn....
03 Oct, 2025
-
5 min read
court gavel.
Virtual Discussion: The Fight for Equal Independent Voting Rights Makes it to SCOTUS
Every major voting rights movement in U.S. history – whether successful or not – has intertwined with landmark litigation. This was the case for women’s suffrage. It was the case for civil rights. And it is the case in the ongoing effort to protect the right of all voters to have equal participation in taxpayer-funded elections – something millions of independent voters are denied across the U.S....
29 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read
Supreme Court building
SCOTUS Considers Challenge to Closed Primaries -- Here's Why It Is Such a Big Deal
In a dramatic step forward for litigation challenging closed primaries, the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated they are going to conference to discuss whether to grant a writ of certiorari to Polelle v. Florida Secretary of State; a case challenging Florida's closed primaries that Open Primaries has supported since its inception....
26 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read
Proposition 50 voter guide
California Prop 50: Partisan Power Play or Necessary Counterpunch?
November 4 marks a special election for what has become the most controversial ballot measure in California in recent memory: Proposition 50, which would circumvent congressional districts drawn by the state’s independent redistricting commission for a legislative-drawn map....
01 Oct, 2025
-
9 min read
court gavel.
Virtual Discussion: The Fight for Equal Independent Voting Rights Makes it to SCOTUS
Every major voting rights movement in U.S. history – whether successful or not – has intertwined with landmark litigation. This was the case for women’s suffrage. It was the case for civil rights. And it is the case in the ongoing effort to protect the right of all voters to have equal participation in taxpayer-funded elections – something millions of independent voters are denied across the U.S....
29 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read
Supreme Court building
SCOTUS Considers Challenge to Closed Primaries -- Here's Why It Is Such a Big Deal
In a dramatic step forward for litigation challenging closed primaries, the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated they are going to conference to discuss whether to grant a writ of certiorari to Polelle v. Florida Secretary of State; a case challenging Florida's closed primaries that Open Primaries has supported since its inception....
26 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read