Cross-Border Healthcare: A Complex Problem Meets a Bipartisan Solution

Nurse standing in front of a backdrop that shows a blank map of California and a blank map of Mexico.
Image created by IVN staff.
Author: Chad Peace
Published: 30 Apr, 2025
Updated: 18 Jun, 2025
3 min read

While healthcare in California has seen massive investments in coverage and access, these gains often mean little to border residents who split time, family, or even residency across two countries.

On the other side, private providers in Baja California frequently serve US citizens, especially for dental, vision, or urgent care services, at dramatically lower prices. Still, there's no mechanism to formally integrate or reimburse these services within our system.

It’s not that people aren't seeking care. It’s that the system wasn’t built to reflect how people actually live in border regions.

The Push for a Binational Healthcare Pathway

This is where AB 955, the Cross-Border Healthcare Implementation Act, comes in. The bill was introduced by Assemblymember David Alvarez, who represents the border-straddling 80th District. 

The bill proposes something rare: policy that acknowledges the practical reality of binational living.

AB 955 would authorize California to partner with certified Mexican healthcare providers, licensed, accredited, and vetted to US standards, to offer approved medical services to California residents.

Whether through full-service hospitals or contract-based providers, the bill seeks to build a regulated, accessible cross-border healthcare network.

Bipartisan Backing for a Binational Issue

This isn’t just another proposal – it’s one that could generate significant bipartisan, if not universal, consensus.

Earlier this month, AB 955 passed the Assembly Health Committee in a unanimous 16-0 vote, with support from Democrats and Republicans alike. In a time when agreement on even basic public health issues can feel elusive, this level of consensus is notable.

IVP Donate

The bill also reflects the cumulative work of legislators from across California, whose focus areas align with the goals of AB 955, even if they don’t all represent border districts:

Former Assemblymember Eduardo Garcia (D-Coachella), for example, has long advocated for California-Mexico collaboration, coauthoring legislation to support the Border Relations Council, which includes healthcare policy. His district includes Imperial County, where cross-border health access is a day-to-day necessity.

State Senator Megan Dahle (R-Bieber) represents rural Northern California, not a border region, but her advocacy for flexible licensing, rural health access, and provider pipelines mirrors the infrastructure needs AB 955 tries to solve on the border.

Assemblymember Tasha Boerner (D-Encinitas) has supported community clinic integration and maternal health equity. Her interest in mobile and community-based delivery models aligns with potential cross-border care delivery approaches.

Together with Alvarez, these legislators bring regional credibility and legislative experience to a conversation that transcends geography and ideology.

When Reality Meets Reform

This isn’t just about cheaper dental care or faster urgent care access. It’s about recognizing how modern communities function and updating our laws to reflect that reality.

Healthcare is deeply personal – but policy doesn’t have to be impersonal. When lawmakers can come together, regardless of party or zip code, to address the real-world needs of their constituents, that’s when democracy actually works.

AB 955 is still making its way through the legislature. But with this kind of bipartisan momentum, and a legislative team that reflects California’s diversity, it just might be the breakthrough border residents have been waiting for.
 

Let Us Vote : Sign Now!

Editorial Note (May 5, 2025):

While AB 955 introduces a new framework for cross-border healthcare, it’s important to note that Mexican prepaid health plans already exist and are licensed by the California Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC). These plans are exempt from many state-level patient protections under the Knox-Keene Act, including standards for timely access to care, network adequacy, grievance processes, and quality oversight.

DMHC has also reported compliance issues, particularly involving denied emergency care reimbursements at U.S. hospitals. If AB 955 leads to expanded cross-border coverage, it will be essential to hold participating plans to the same standards of care and oversight required of other California health plans to ensure patient protection.

Related articles

homelessness in California
Clearing Homeless Encampments Is a Band-Aid, Not A Solution
Last July, Governor Gavin Newsom issued an executive order “to address (homeless) encampments” and allocated funding to local governments to clear encampments and connect “those living in them to housing and supportive services.” ...
20 Jun, 2025
-
3 min read
CA flag and American flag next to each other.
Voter ID: The Republicans' Nonpartisan Issue in California?
Republican lawmakers, political groups, and donors are going to attempt to qualify a constitutional amendment for California’s November 2026 ballot that would require voters to present government-issued identification and verify their citizenship before casting a ballot....
17 Jun, 2025
-
7 min read
Downtown LA.
Peaceful, and Violent, Protests in Los Angeles
What began as peaceful immigration policy protests on June 6 has escalated into a national political crisis, with violent clashes, arrests, looted businesses, burning Waymo cars, a smashed government building, nighttime curfews, and an epic legal showdown between California officials and President Donald Trump fueled by partisan flames of political division....
11 Jun, 2025
-
22 min read

Latest articles

Don Bacon
'Why Am I Doing This?': Don Bacon’s Retirement Reflects a Congress Driving Out Problem Solvers
U.S. Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) recently announced his retirement from Congress, but the reasons he cites for his departure underscore a growing problem in Washington -- specifically, a rejection of problem solving in favor of division, partisan gamesmanship, and provocation....
09 Jul, 2025
-
4 min read
Jail cell.
Nixon Admitted Weed Wasn’t Dangerous, But Killed It to Crush Political Dissent
This seven-part series chronicles the milestones, backlash, and unintended consequences that have shaped the war on cannabis from the 1960s to the present day....
09 Jul, 2025
-
2 min read
Elon Musk in front of the US Capitol Building.
7 Things Elon Musk Needs to Do If the America Party Wants to Be More Than a Meme
The World’s Richest Man Will Have to Overcome America’s Toughest Political Obstacles — Here’s What It Will Take to Make His America Party Thrive...
08 Jul, 2025
-
4 min read