Common Sense Party Supports IVP Lawsuit Challenging Constitutionality of California's Presidential Primary

Published: 12 Nov, 2019
2 min read

There are now over 5.4 million No Party Preference (NPP) voters in California. They represent the fastest growing segment of the electorate and are the second largest voting bloc in California.

In 2016, however, there was widespread confusion over the rules that govern who can and cannot vote in the taxpayer-funded and publicly administered election process.

This confusion inordinately affects NPP voters who must: (1) know which parties allow them to participate and, (2) actively request a “crossover” ballot to receive a ballot with that party’s presidential candidates.

SIGN UP: Stay informed on Common Sense Party News

The consequence of this barrier to voter participation is the voter suppression of millions of California voters who either can’t or don’t know how to vote for the presidential candidate of their choice. This compromises the democratic integrity of every election on every ballot that is conducted alongside the presidential primary. This disparity in turnout will be even greater given that both major parties dedicate increasingly more resources to ballot harvesting.

California’s constitution is clear: the legislature shall provide for an “open” presidential primary. The United States constitution is clear: no one should be forced to associate with an organization they don’t support, especially not as a condition of participating in our taxpayer-funded election process.

California has a long history of advancing voting rights. But the current leadership in Sacramento is standing in the way of millions of voters and their right to vote.

This month, the Independent Voter Project filed an injunction against the California Secretary of State stating, among other claims, that California’s confusing semi-closed presidential primary puts the interests of political parties before the constitutional rights of California's voters.

Tom Campbell, Interim Chairman of the Common Sense Party said:

We’ve started the Common Sense Party to represent a responsible, open, and inclusive approach to government. As part of that mission, we seek to represent voters across the political spectrum, including California’s 5.4 million NPP voters, whether they join our party or not.”

Independent Voter Project also offered a common sense solution to solve the confusion: simply give any voter who wants to participate a “public” ballot that lists all the Presidential primary candidates.

IVP Donate

Debbie Benrey, Interim Vice-Chair of the Common Sense Party said, “The IVP’s lawsuit offers a practical solution to avoid repeating the same voter confusion that occurred in 2016.  Why not just print a ballot that allows all voters to participate?  It’s simply common sense.”

The California Common Sense political organization (soon to be the Common Sense Party) stands alongside the Independent Voter Project and millions of NPP voters to support this important lawsuit against the California Secretary of State.

More information about the Common Sense Party can be found at cacommonsense.org or facebook.com/cacommonsense.

Read all motions and court filings and get more information about the California lawsuit on the Independent Voter Project's website.

You Might Also Like

Judge Slams Door on New Attack Against California’s Top Two Primary
Judge Slams Door on New Attack Against California’s Top Two Primary
A group of minor parties in California challenged the state's nonpartisan Top Two primary in court and a federal judge handed them another loss, ruling in part that they can’t keep suing over arguments already rejected by other courts....
15 Apr, 2026
-
4 min read
Can Buffalo Succeed Where NYC Failed on Election Reform?
Can Buffalo Succeed Where NYC Failed on Election Reform?
The Buffalo Charter Revision Commission voted 7-2 Monday to pass a resolution that ensures it will explore open primaries, ranked choice voting (RCV), and expanded ballot access. It is not a guarantee on any reform, but it is a step closer to change....
14 Apr, 2026
-
6 min read
Why Trump Really Hates Alaska's Ranked Choice Voting
Why Trump Really Hates Alaska's Ranked Choice Voting
President Trump called Alaska's ranked choice voting system "disastrous" and "very fraudulent" on Friday. He gave his "complete and total support" to the repeal effort heading to Alaska's 2026 ballot....
13 Apr, 2026
-
6 min read
Michigan GOP Kicks Out RCV Advocates, Calls Them ‘Communists’ over Reform Republicans Use
Michigan GOP Kicks Out RCV Advocates, Calls Them ‘Communists’ over Reform Republicans Use
On March 28, the ranked choice voting advocacy group, Rank MI Vote was kicked out of the Michigan Republican Party Convention. Reports say one Republican state lawmaker called volunteers “communists” and even threatened physical violence....
06 Apr, 2026
-
14 min read
Democracy Reformers Admit Their Biggest Problem: They Keep Talking to Themselves
Democracy Reformers Admit Their Biggest Problem: They Keep Talking to Themselves
At the March 25 Democracy Network Exchange meeting, reform advocates confronting 2024 losses on ranked choice voting and other ballot measures pointed to a hard truth: insider language, weak grassroots investment, and abstract messaging are still undermining structural reform campaigns. ...
31 Mar, 2026
-
5 min read
Can a Party Call Itself ‘Independent’? Judge Accuses No Labels Party of ‘Bait-and-Switch’
Can a Party Call Itself ‘Independent’? Judge Accuses No Labels Party of ‘Bait-and-Switch’
The No Labels Party in Arizona cannot change its name to the Arizona Independent Party. This is the decision from Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Gregory Como, who called it a “political bait-and-switch.” ...
30 Mar, 2026
-
12 min read