Common Sense Party Supports IVP Lawsuit Challenging Constitutionality of California's Presidential Primary

Published: 12 Nov, 2019
2 min read

There are now over 5.4 million No Party Preference (NPP) voters in California. They represent the fastest growing segment of the electorate and are the second largest voting bloc in California.

In 2016, however, there was widespread confusion over the rules that govern who can and cannot vote in the taxpayer-funded and publicly administered election process.

This confusion inordinately affects NPP voters who must: (1) know which parties allow them to participate and, (2) actively request a “crossover” ballot to receive a ballot with that party’s presidential candidates.

SIGN UP: Stay informed on Common Sense Party News

The consequence of this barrier to voter participation is the voter suppression of millions of California voters who either can’t or don’t know how to vote for the presidential candidate of their choice. This compromises the democratic integrity of every election on every ballot that is conducted alongside the presidential primary. This disparity in turnout will be even greater given that both major parties dedicate increasingly more resources to ballot harvesting.

California’s constitution is clear: the legislature shall provide for an “open” presidential primary. The United States constitution is clear: no one should be forced to associate with an organization they don’t support, especially not as a condition of participating in our taxpayer-funded election process.

California has a long history of advancing voting rights. But the current leadership in Sacramento is standing in the way of millions of voters and their right to vote.

This month, the Independent Voter Project filed an injunction against the California Secretary of State stating, among other claims, that California’s confusing semi-closed presidential primary puts the interests of political parties before the constitutional rights of California's voters.

Tom Campbell, Interim Chairman of the Common Sense Party said:

We’ve started the Common Sense Party to represent a responsible, open, and inclusive approach to government. As part of that mission, we seek to represent voters across the political spectrum, including California’s 5.4 million NPP voters, whether they join our party or not.”

Independent Voter Project also offered a common sense solution to solve the confusion: simply give any voter who wants to participate a “public” ballot that lists all the Presidential primary candidates.

IVP Donate

Debbie Benrey, Interim Vice-Chair of the Common Sense Party said, “The IVP’s lawsuit offers a practical solution to avoid repeating the same voter confusion that occurred in 2016.  Why not just print a ballot that allows all voters to participate?  It’s simply common sense.”

The California Common Sense political organization (soon to be the Common Sense Party) stands alongside the Independent Voter Project and millions of NPP voters to support this important lawsuit against the California Secretary of State.

More information about the Common Sense Party can be found at cacommonsense.org or facebook.com/cacommonsense.

Read all motions and court filings and get more information about the California lawsuit on the Independent Voter Project's website.

You Might Also Like

The Federal Voter ID Bill Is Designed to Fail. Here's Why
The Federal Voter ID Bill Is Designed to Fail. Here's Why
Most Americans support voter ID, so why is this fight so explosive? It’s simple: the two-party system keeps turning a broadly popular reform into a partisan weapon. Instead of solving the issue, both sides use it to energize their base and deepen distrust....
12 Mar, 2026
-
3 min read
Paul Rieckhoff Tells Stephen Colbert: Voters Shouldn't Have to Pick a Party to Matter
Paul Rieckhoff Tells Stephen Colbert: Voters Shouldn't Have to Pick a Party to Matter
Paul Rieckhoff wears many hats. He is a veteran of the Iraq War, founded Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, national security analyst, author, producer, podcaster, and founder of Independent Veterans of America....
11 Mar, 2026
-
2 min read
Did New Petition Rules Kill Oklahoma’s Open Primaries Initiative?
Did New Petition Rules Kill Oklahoma’s Open Primaries Initiative?
Last week, the Oklahoma campaign to put a nonpartisan all-voter and all-candidate nonpartisan primary initiative on the ballot was informed that it did not collect enough signatures to be certified. This means state voters won’t get a say on the matter in 2026....
10 Mar, 2026
-
5 min read
How James Talarico Won Over Independents Amid Texas Primary Chaos
How James Talarico Won Over Independents Amid Texas Primary Chaos
James Talarico wins Texas’ Democratic Senate primary as campaigns point to unusually high independent participation in the state’s open primary system. Then Dallas County’s last-minute switch back to precinct-only voting sparks confusion, long lines, and a legal fight over ballots cast after 7 p.m....
05 Mar, 2026
-
3 min read
Don’t Kill Top Two. Upgrade It: A Smarter Way to Elect California’s Governor
Don’t Kill Top Two. Upgrade It: A Smarter Way to Elect California’s Governor
The answer to today’s crowded field is not retreat. It is modernization. Instead of empowering party gatekeepers, we can empower voters with more choice, less vote splitting, and majority-supported outcomes....
03 Mar, 2026
-
4 min read
No Referee in the Midterms? Trump’s FEC Nominations Come After 10 Months of Zero Federal Oversight
No Referee in the Midterms? Trump’s FEC Nominations Come After 10 Months of Zero Federal Oversight
As February wrapped up, it was reported that President Donald Trump had nominated two Republicans for the Federal Elections Commission after 10 months of the agency being unable to perform its basic functions....
02 Mar, 2026
-
9 min read