Californians to Decide GMO Labeling Debate on Prop 37

Californians to Decide GMO Labeling Debate on Prop 37
Published: 04 Nov, 2012
2 min read

Prop 37 in the state of California will be on the ballot November 6th. The voter guide provides a description of the bill and what it means. There is a group for and against this referendum and their claims will be examined through the prism of the description offered in the California voter's guide.

Genetically Engineered food (GE) are foods which are those animals and plants that have been altered at the genetic level for benefits.  Labeling will be required for all raw foods such as fruits and vegetables that are even partially modified by GE must have labels on their package or in the bin or shelf they are being displayed.

The labeling would also extend to processed foods such those that contain corn syrup. Not all foods will be required to be labeled such as milk that is not soy, beef and chicken that are not genetically modified themselves but have been fed grains and foods that have. Also, organic foods will be all be exempt from this labeling.

The regulation if the labeling will be done by the Department of Health Services of California. This regulation will allow consumers to sue manufactures, producers, and stores who mislabel products if not corrected within 30 days. This will conform to the  Consumers Legal remedies Act which allows such lawsuits without need to show damages.

A large group of big food manufacturers, seed producers, biotechnology firms such as Monsanto, DuPont, PepsiCo, and Kraft Foods to name a few. These groups claim that the cost of the grocery store will cost folk between 300 and 400 more dollars a year. This claim is based on the food industry having to reformulate their foods with non-modified versions of the products just for the California market.

In addition the folks against the bill point to the rise of frivolous lawsuits if it passes. This again does not seem to be backed up by anything written in the bill. It is true that consumers can sue without the need to show damages. But the law would allow the manufacture or distributor of the product that is mislabeled 30 days to correct the issue before a lawsuit could go forward.

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read