Arizona's Make Elections Fair Act: It's Not About Ranked Choice Voting

voting
Photo by Getty Images on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by author.
Published: 05 Aug, 2024
3 min read

The Arizona Free Enterprise Club filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a ballot initiative that would require state lawmakers to adopt a primary system that allows all voters and candidates, regardless of party, to participate on a single ballot.

The organization asserts that the initiative, sponsored by Make Elections Fair AZ, amends the constitution in several distinct ways and thus violates the state’s single-subject and separate amendment rule – but it also gets plenty of things wrong about the initiative.

The purpose of the Make Elections Fair Arizona Act, the initiative being challenged, is to level the playing field in elections for all candidates and voters in a manner that is free of the controlling influence of partisan politics. This is stated under its “Purpose and Intent.”

“To accomplish these goals, this Constitutional Amendment creates a primary system in which people may vote for the candidate of their choice, regardless of the political party of the voter or the candidate," the initiative states.

ALSO READ: Arizona Initiative: Parties Can Either Accept Open Primaries or Pay for Them

It is first and foremost a primary reform initiative. However, the Arizona Free Enterprise Club claims in its lawsuit that the initiative “contains distinctly different topics and amends multiple sections of the Arizona constitution,” and thus violates the state’s Separate Amendment Rule.

The lawsuit points to certain changes that could be made to the general election, like the adoption of ranked choice voting (RCV) – but the addition of RCV is purely hypothetical.

The initiative stipulates that the election model used is up to the legislature.

The most important requirement is that lawmakers have to use a nonpartisan primary system. The initiative allows for flexibility when it comes to the general election

IVP Donate

State lawmakers could choose to go with a Top Two system, like in California, for elections that elect only one candidate. In this case, the winner of the general election is guaranteed to have a majority of the vote because there are only two candidates.

Or, they could go with a Top Four system like in Alaska. In the event 3 or more candidates advance to the general election then the initiative requires a ranking method for voters to use to determine a majority winner. 

This is an if. It all comes down to the legislature and if the legislature fails to provide a nonpartisan election system, it would be the responsibility of the state’s chief elections administrator, the secretary of state, to decide what election model is best to use.

If state lawmakers object to a ranking method, they can enact a Top Two system – but the model adopted should be one built on equal treatment of voters and candidates (who would have the same signature requirements).

That’s the point. And it starts with primary elections.

The Make Elections Fair Act would amend the language in various parts of a single Article in the Arizona Constitution, Article VII, and if adopted would apply to state elections that occur after July 1, 2026. 

The lawsuit filed by the Arizona Free Enterprise Club comes after the Arizona Legislative Council adopted language for the initiative for voter pamphlets that intentionally focuses on ranked choice voting, which again is not guaranteed or required.

"This initiative is arguably the most important reform in our lifetime," said Sarah Smallhouse, chair of Make Elections Fair, in an interview for Public News Service. "It's time to do right by Arizona. It's time to start fixing things. It's time to make elections fair."

Let Us Vote : Sign Now!

Make Elections Fair AZ suggested changes to the language to ensure that it was not confusing to voters. The legislative council, however, rejected them – leading to Make Elections Fair to file its own lawsuit against state lawmakers. 

Arizona Attorney General Kris Maye believes the partisan legislative council is improperly trying to influence the vote on the Make Elections Fair Act and other initiatives. A Maricopa County superior court will consider and rule on the language challenge

You Might Also Like

Alaska
Alaska Supreme Court Scrutinizes Church-Funded Effort to Undermine Open Primaries and RCV
The Alaska Supreme Court is considering whether opponents of open primaries and ranked-choice voting broke state law when they funneled money through a Washington-based church to support a repeal campaign....
03 Nov, 2025
-
2 min read
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
Isn't It Weird That Congress Feels No Urgency to Re-Open the Government?
Isn't It Weird That Congress Feels No Urgency to Re-Open the Government?
The U.S. has entered Day 22 of the latest government shutdown with no end in sight. As pundits expect it to surpass the 35-day record set during Trump’s first term, a new Gallup poll shows voters’ approval of Congress has plummeted in the last month. Yet, for congressional leaders, there isn’t any urgency to re-open the government. House Speaker Mike Johnson and Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries trade jabs back and forth in the media, but the blame game continues to be prioritized over solutions....
22 Oct, 2025
-
5 min read
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read