Alaska Better Elections Campaign: Partisan Primaries Have Failed Our State

Alaska Better Elections Campaign: Partisan Primaries Have Failed Our State
Published: 27 Aug, 2020
2 min read

The Alaskans for Better Elections “Yes on 2” campaign says the poor turnout in Alaska’s closed partisan primaries points to the biggest reason the state needs to update the way it does elections: the disenfranchisement of voters who choose not to register Republican or Democrat.

According to the Alaska Secretary of State’s office, 19% of registered voters participated in the August 18 primary. This means a small fraction of the electorate decided who won these primary elections, and in many districts (safe for one party or the other) -- the general election as well.

“It’s a system that shuts out independents and candidates who are living by the words ‘to hell with politics’ and doing what’s right for Alaska,” said Yes on 2 for Better Elections Campaign Manager Shea Siegert.  


The current primary system in place in Alaska allows the parties to exclude unaffiliated (or independent) voters in these taxpayer-funded elections. It is a system that leaves nearly two-thirds (63% at present) out in the cold while the political minority decides the candidates they can choose from in November.

It is a system, the “Yes on 2” campaign says, that empowers party bosses, while the reforms it is proposing empowers voters.

Ballot Measure 2 would replace the closed partisan primary with a nonpartisan top-four primary where all voters and candidates participate on a single ballot and the top four vote-getters move on to the general election. It’s a system that levels the opportunity for voters to have an equal and meaningful say in the process without conditioning their right to vote on joining a private political party.

“Open primaries create a better political culture, allowing legislators to work across the aisle to get things done. The parties can still endorse the candidates they want to support—but they shouldn’t be able to control who appears on the ballot,” said Siegert.

The ballot measure also requires the use of ranked choice voting in the general election to ensure majority winners, and would put in place stricter campaign finance disclosure requirements

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read