Transparency Advocates Concerned With San Diego City Attorney Mara Elliott's Public Records Bill

image
Jeff PowersJeff Powers
Published: 07 Mar, 2019
2 min read

San Diego, Calif.-  San Diego City Attorney Mara Elliott has created government transparency concerns with her drafting of Senate Bill 615.

Elliott says her bill is a win-win for transparency and the taxpayers:

"Ensuring the public’s access to information is critical, yet in recent years, the City of San Diego, and public agencies statewide, have struggled to keep up with a widening avalanche of Public Records Act requests," Elliott noted.

SB 615 would require public agencies and record-seekers to engage in a “meet and confer” session — basically, a conversation aimed at resolving disputes in good faith before misunderstandings can escalate and a lawsuit follows.

Elliott contends the “meet and confer” process will prevent those unnecessary lawsuits and expensive judgments.

A Hinderance For The Public

"This action adds an unnecessary layer of bureaucracy to an already challenging process for the public." - Former San Diego City Councilwoman Donna Frye

Former San Diego City Councilwoman Donna Frye says the "meet and confer" provision will only make the process more burdensome for the public.

"To say that this bill is to help the public is just not believable. This needs to be stopped as it has nothing to do with streamlining the process for the public," Frye continued, "The easiest way to make sure the public has those documents is to post them online. Pretty simple. Make is easy, not more difficult."

Frye, a longtime champion of government transparency, also raised questions regarding the legal jurisdiction of the City Attorney's office.

IVP Donate

"Why is the San Diego City Attorney driving statewide legislation," Frye quipped, "and why hasn't the city council, the true legislative body of the City of San Diego, not weighed in on something so fundamental? Or are they going to have the City Attorney now handle the legislative branch of government."

Frye is not alone in her criticism.

Flood of Criticism

News organizations and public watchdog advocates like attorney and San Diego Mayoral candidate Cory Briggs, has been very critical of the SB-615 language drafted by Elliott and her office.

On his twitter feed, Briggs noted his concerns:

"Let's review all the things that @CityAttorneySD and @MaraWElliott didn't tell @SenBenHueso before they duped him into carrying their dirty water in gutting the California Public Records Act. Ben isn't dumb, but he's got rolled by Mara."

Briggs also raised the point that in these cases, public sector lawyers like City Attorney Mara Elliott, are immune from malpractice judgments:

Hueso Hedging? 

State Senator Ben Hueso, who was poised to bring SB-615 to the floor in Sacramento, now tells IVN he will not move forward with ANY legislation that compromises government transparency.

Let Us Vote : Sign Now!

Importantly, the final language of SB-615, will be drafted by Legislative Counsel in consultation with Senator Hueso’s staff.

In a statement to IVN, Hueso expressed his goals for SB-615. “My objective is to protect taxpayers while increasing transparency in government," promising, “I will not move forward with any legislation that compromises the obligation of government to be transparent in any way.”

You Might Also Like

SQ836 supporters
Oklahoma GOP Fails To Block Open Primaries Initiative from Going Before Voters
The Oklahoma Supreme Court on Tuesday unanimously rejected a challenge to a proposed ballot initiative that would open taxpayer-funded primary elections to all candidates and voters, regardless of party affiliation – paving the way for the signature petition process to begin....
17 Sep, 2025
-
4 min read
Supreme Court of the United States
Forward Party Joins Petition to SCOTUS Against State of Florida
Right now, the divide between the Republican and Democratic Parties appears beyond repair. The political rhetoric is toxic, the nation’s leadership puts party gain before lasting solutions, and few voters actually feel heard by the people elected to represent them. At a time when it seems things will only get worse from here, the Independent Voter Project filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court along with Open Primaries and the Forward Party in support of a lawsuit that targets one of the biggest culprits behind all of this....
16 Sep, 2025
-
3 min read
congress flag
Poll: 82% of Americans Want Redistricting Done by Independent Commission, Not Politicians
There may be no greater indication that voters are not being listened to in the escalating redistricting war between the Republican and Democratic Parties than a new poll from NBC News that shows 8-in-10 Americans want the parties to stop....
10 Sep, 2025
-
3 min read