San Diego Police Department Cost Taxpayers $1.5 Million For Conduct With Nude Dancers

image
Jeff PowersJeff Powers
Published: 31 Oct, 2018
2 min read

San Diego, Calif.- In a very quiet manner, the San Diego City Council approved payments and legal settlements to sixteen exotic dancers without discussion on the city council’s consent agenda Tuesday.

The council approved a $1,492,500 payment to the dancers and attorneys who claimed the officers harassed and violated the dancers civil rights.

The incidents happened in 2014 and 2015. Police Chief Shelley Zimmerman was leading the department at the time.

San Diego Police Department officers questioned dancers at the Cheetahs and Expose clubs making sure the dancers were in compliance.

The dancers claim the license checks were an illegal use of police force because, and according to Attorney Dan Gilleon, herded the dancers into their dressing rooms, ordered them to change from street clothes to bras and underpants, took photos of their tattoos and piercings, and refused to let them leave.

One of the dancers joined the lawsuit because she felt the officers carried guns and wore bullet-proof vests, an unprovoked and unnecessary show of force.

"Not just a show of force like 'We can do this,' but 'We're going to do this and we're going to be jerks about it, and we're going to degrade you and humiliate you, and we're going to show you who's boss,’" the dancer said.

Gilleon, who represented the dancers, argued that the officers' use of force, threats, and involuntary detention violated his clients' basic legal rights.

Federal Judge James Lorenz agreed in part, ruling that "...using inspections as a means of harassing and discouraging adult entertainment businesses violated the First Amendment, on its face."

IVP Donate

“You're never going to get the city attorney's office or the city of San Diego to admit they did anything wrong,” Gilleon said. “But when they pay $1.5 million, that's an admission."

Each dancer will receive about $55,000 from the city’s general fund, after deductions for attorneys’ fees and legal costs.

The police department, city attorney and mayor declined comment.

You Might Also Like

Proposition 50 voter guide
California Prop 50: Partisan Power Play or Necessary Counterpunch?
November 4 marks a special election for what has become the most controversial ballot measure in California in recent memory: Proposition 50, which would circumvent congressional districts drawn by the state’s independent redistricting commission for a legislative-drawn map....
01 Oct, 2025
-
9 min read
court gavel.
Virtual Discussion: The Fight for Equal Independent Voting Rights Makes it to SCOTUS
Every major voting rights movement in U.S. history – whether successful or not – has intertwined with landmark litigation. This was the case for women’s suffrage. It was the case for civil rights. And it is the case in the ongoing effort to protect the right of all voters to have equal participation in taxpayer-funded elections – something millions of independent voters are denied across the U.S....
29 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read
Supreme Court building
SCOTUS Considers Challenge to Closed Primaries -- Here's Why It Is Such a Big Deal
In a dramatic step forward for litigation challenging closed primaries, the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated they are going to conference to discuss whether to grant a writ of certiorari to Polelle v. Florida Secretary of State; a case challenging Florida's closed primaries that Open Primaries has supported since its inception....
26 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read