Actual Supreme Court News: Gerrymandering Cases Make New Appearance

image
Published: 02 Oct, 2018
Updated: 21 Nov, 2022
3 min read

As Brett Kavanaugh proceeds through an FBI investigation, a partisan war, and a scathing court of public opinion, the world seems to have forgotten the institution he is headed toward - the Supreme Court.

Shorthanded by one, with a bench of eight, the court started its 2018-’19 session Monday. Its current roster of cases may not sound very exciting to some (the fate of an endangered frog vs landowners), but three major partisan gerrymandering cases hit the Supreme Court during its last session and they may be back again for this one.

The results of these cases out of North Carolina, Wisconsin and Maryland could draw a very thick line in the constitutional sand over the creation of electoral maps and the length the judiciary will go to keep partisanship out of it.

North Carolina

Back in June, SCOTUS pushed off a precedent-setting decision on the constitutionality of North Carolina’s partisan gerrymandered electoral maps that were designed to favor Republicans over Democrats. A US District Court ruled that the map’s partisan slant violated the First Amendment and the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.

 Judge James Wynn wrote:

“The Constitution does not allow elected officials to enact laws that distort the marketplace of political ideas so as to intentionally favor certain political beliefs, parties, or candidates and disfavor others.”

And while it was ruled unconstitutional, there is “insufficient time… to approve a new districting plan and for the State to conduct an election using that plan.”

The state filed a request to appeal the district court’s decision. The plaintiffs have 30 days to respond. And if the court is responsive, oral arguments could be heard as late as next spring.

SCOTUS also kicked the can down the road in Wisconsin and in Maryland gerrymandering cases - but for different reasons.

IVP Donate

The Supreme Court sent a Wisconsin gerrymander case back to a lower court, stating that the Democratic plaintiffs had to prove that the Republican-drawn redistricting maps directly impacted individuals. Democrats went back to the drawing board and have just added 28 additional plaintiffs to the lawsuit who claim that they were, in fact, individually impacted or were injured.

SCOTUS also rejected a case against Democrats brought by Republicans in Maryland. Plaintiffs asked the court to overturn a district court decision not to block Maryland from holding congressional elections using a 2011 map, which would force the state to redraw the sixth district. Republican voters in the state argued that Democrats drew the district lines to dilute their voting power.

SCOTUS said the plaintiffs waited six years too long to seek redress. On Thursday, a district court will hear arguments from both sides over their interpretation of SCOTUS’s findings which could kick the case back to the high court.

Looking Ahead

According to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, the final vote to move Judge Kavanaugh through the Senate and onto the Supreme Court will take place this week, pending the close of the FBI's investigation. The court has around 23 cases to hear before December, but the docket is reasonably open after that.

So if he is ready to hear cases, and issue decisions, we could see these gerrymandering cases go before before a 5-4, conservative-dominated court.

Latest articles

CA capitol building dome with flags.
Why is CA Senator Mike McGuire Trying to Kill the Legal Cannabis Industry?
California’s legal cannabis industry is under mounting pressure, and in early June, state lawmakers and the governor appeared poised to help. A bill to freeze the state’s cannabis excise tax at 15% sailed through the State Assembly with a unanimous 74-0 vote. The governor’s office backed the plan. And legal cannabis businesses, still struggling to compete with unregulated sellers and mounting operating costs, saw a glimmer of hope....
03 Jul, 2025
-
7 min read
I voted buttons
After First RCV Election, Charlottesville Voters Back the Reform: 'They Get It, They Like It, They Want to Do It Again'
A new survey out of Charlottesville, Virginia, shows overwhelming support for ranked choice voting (RCV) following the city’s first use of the system in its June Democratic primary for City Council. Conducted one week after the election, the results found that nearly 90% of respondents support continued use of RCV....
03 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
Crowd in Time Square.
NYC Exit Survey: 96% of Voters Understood Their Ranked Choice Ballots
An exit poll conducted by SurveyUSA on behalf of the nonprofit better elections group FairVote finds that ranked choice voting (RCV) continues to be supported by a vast majority of voters who find it simple, fair, and easy to use. The findings come in the wake of the city’s third use of RCV in its June 2025 primary elections....
01 Jul, 2025
-
6 min read