SCOTUS Digital Political Ads Now Searchable

image
Published: 10 Jul, 2018
Updated: 21 Nov, 2022
2 min read

Judge Brett Kavanaugh now proceeds to his confirmation hearing as President Trump’s nominee to the Supreme Court and the possible replacement for Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy.

Advocacy groups were a step ahead of the mainstream media in their prepared and pre-titled digital political ads. Biased, partisan bios were conjured for each judge on the short list of possible nominees as well as the narrative warnings. Ad cash and domain names were secured well in advance of an announcement. No requirements for confirming information - they can go on rumors and conjecture. Some - ahem Judicial Crisis Network, filled its arsenal before Justice Kennedy's retirement.

In a bid to mop up it's  2016- presidential-campaign-Russian-disinformation-debacle, Facebook has given us a tool to get a better idea of who is publishing the political ads. The who, what, when, and where, regarding its sponsored political ads are searchable - all except the 'how.' As in, “How were these ads paid for? Specifically?” It is a common and essential question for some electoral reformers.

A few easily searchable examples:

Batting for the conservative side, The Judicial Crisis Network launched a $1.4 million  'Confirm Brett Kavanaugh' ad buy on national cable and digital platforms. JCN ran another one, #AnotherGreatJustice, which is a bio spot,  just after Justice Kennedy announced his retirement.

Demand Justice,  a left-of-center 501(c)(4)  is billed as a judicial nominee advocacy group. It was formed this year and is stacked with Clinton and Obama alumni. They’re still smarting from 2016 and shuffled together ads on Monday urging voters to “stop Trump’s SCOTUS takeover.”  According to a  New York Times article  the director of Demand Justice, Brian Fallon “said he was more than halfway to this initial fundraising goal," and said in May 2018 that he “expects to raise $10 million in its first year.”

As tech companies step up their transparency, the Federal Election Commission is still figuring out its role. A few tough spots include deciding which ad types must label themselves as political, as well as which kind of ad or even mention denotes a requirement to disclose the funding source. So while efforts have been made to tack on the word 'transparency' to the Facebook business model, still campaign messaging will find a way to skirt rules and grow using technicalities. 

Latest articles

CA capitol building dome with flags.
Why is CA Senator Mike McGuire Trying to Kill the Legal Cannabis Industry?
California’s legal cannabis industry is under mounting pressure, and in early June, state lawmakers and the governor appeared poised to help. A bill to freeze the state’s cannabis excise tax at 15% sailed through the State Assembly with a unanimous 74-0 vote. The governor’s office backed the plan. And legal cannabis businesses, still struggling to compete with unregulated sellers and mounting operating costs, saw a glimmer of hope....
03 Jul, 2025
-
7 min read
I voted buttons
After First RCV Election, Charlottesville Voters Back the Reform: 'They Get It, They Like It, They Want to Do It Again'
A new survey out of Charlottesville, Virginia, shows overwhelming support for ranked choice voting (RCV) following the city’s first use of the system in its June Democratic primary for City Council. Conducted one week after the election, the results found that nearly 90% of respondents support continued use of RCV....
03 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
Crowd in Time Square.
NYC Exit Survey: 96% of Voters Understood Their Ranked Choice Ballots
An exit poll conducted by SurveyUSA on behalf of the nonprofit better elections group FairVote finds that ranked choice voting (RCV) continues to be supported by a vast majority of voters who find it simple, fair, and easy to use. The findings come in the wake of the city’s third use of RCV in its June 2025 primary elections....
01 Jul, 2025
-
6 min read