Drafting Error Causing "Full Voter Participation Act" Confusion

image
Author: Jeff Powers
Published: 18 Jun, 2018
Updated: 21 Nov, 2022
3 min read

San Diego, CA- A scramble is underway in Sacramento to correct a bill drafting error that set an incorrect signature threshold for the Full Voter Participation Act (FVPA), a measure that could change elections for San Diego County.

The FVPA was scheduled to be put on the ballot this November, but that certainty is gone.

The measure would do for the county what Measure K did for the city, eliminate the 50%+1 rule and move elections to the November General election when the most voters participate.

Here's essentially what happened:

Assemblyman Todd Gloria and the legislative counsel in Sacramento, penned a bill that stated the FVPA needs to be signed by 10% of the qualified electors in the county, or ALL voters.

That translates to 165,984 valid signatures, far more than what state law requires which is 10% of voters who turned out in the previous election, roughly 67,000 valid signatures.

Supporters turned in 103,328 signatures, substantially more than what they thought would be required.

Or so they thought.

County Registrar Sends Letter

Last week San Diego County Registrar of Voters Michael Vu sent a letter to the proponents of the FVPA saying they had not reached the signature threshold.

IVP Donate

Vu's Determination letter: 

Vu told IVN San Diego, "I sent a letter saying there was an insufficient number of signatures that were submitted. What was submitted after we did the raw count was 103,328 signatures but based of the current law that's found in the government code section 23725, the total number of required signatures was a minimum of 165,984."

Vu has followed the law and is now waiting to hear back from Sacramento. "It really rests in the hands of the legislature and the governor. First to amend that section of the code, and then sign off of it. From there is my understanding is it will take effect immediately based on what the amendments to the bill calls for."

Time Becomes An Issue

Now Gloria and the legislature must act quickly fix the drafting mistake. Once the fix is in and voted on by the legislature, Governor Brown will sign it. Then, according to the FVPA folks, it's back to Vu to prep for November.

Or so they hope.

The date they have circled is August 7, that's the deadline date to get the bill to the Board of Supervisors for sign off in order to get it on the November General election.

David Lagstein is the Political Director for SEIU Local 221. Lagstein told IVN San Diego, "The first issue is we believe he (Vu) misinterpreted the law. There was a drafting error but we believe the legislative intent was not to change the signatures to qualify for an initiative."

Lagstein continued, "The concern that we have was the County Registrar's early decision with this matter was a politically driven decision due to pressure by the Board of Supervisors. We believe if the legislation is signed by Governor Jerry Brown, we believe there is plenty of time to get this on the November ballot, which is what the 103,000 voters thought they were signing."

Lagstein believes Vu should have waited his full 30 days before issuing his letter. He says Gloria's fix will be done in days, and Lagstein says, this whole mess could have been avoided.

Let Us Vote : Sign Now!

The Push To Oust Supervisor Gaspar

Supervisor Gaspar's Chief of Staff Dustin Steiner has emphasized to IVN San Diego that Lagstein makes political charges that "aren't based in fact." Steiner noted that no one in Gaspar's office has had any contact with Michael Vu or anyone else at the Registrar’s office on this matter.

Some have argued that the real reason Lagstein and the Dems are in a rush to fix their admitted error, is to make sure the FVPA impacts the 2020 District 3 Supervisor race.

The thinking goes that by forcing Supervisor Kristin Gaspar to the November General election, where more people vote than the June primary, she will be vulnerable.  Democrats have control of the City Council and are looking to do the same at the county. They believe this strategy helps them achieve that dominance.

Latest articles

CA capitol building dome with flags.
Why is CA Senator Mike McGuire Trying to Kill the Legal Cannabis Industry?
California’s legal cannabis industry is under mounting pressure, and in early June, state lawmakers and the governor appeared poised to help. A bill to freeze the state’s cannabis excise tax at 15% sailed through the State Assembly with a unanimous 74-0 vote. The governor’s office backed the plan. And legal cannabis businesses, still struggling to compete with unregulated sellers and mounting operating costs, saw a glimmer of hope....
03 Jul, 2025
-
7 min read
I voted buttons
After First RCV Election, Charlottesville Voters Back the Reform: 'They Get It, They Like It, They Want to Do It Again'
A new survey out of Charlottesville, Virginia, shows overwhelming support for ranked choice voting (RCV) following the city’s first use of the system in its June Democratic primary for City Council. Conducted one week after the election, the results found that nearly 90% of respondents support continued use of RCV....
03 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
Crowd in Time Square.
NYC Exit Survey: 96% of Voters Understood Their Ranked Choice Ballots
An exit poll conducted by SurveyUSA on behalf of the nonprofit better elections group FairVote finds that ranked choice voting (RCV) continues to be supported by a vast majority of voters who find it simple, fair, and easy to use. The findings come in the wake of the city’s third use of RCV in its June 2025 primary elections....
01 Jul, 2025
-
6 min read