More Bizarre Developments in Case Against Former Wasserman Schultz Staffer

image
Published: 12 Oct, 2017
Updated: 21 Nov, 2022
2 min read

Update 10/12/17: US Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) says there are "hundreds of potential federal charges" in the Awan scandal.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFDs22s3DUY

Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Mirando revealed in federal court proceedings that former congressional IT staffer Imran Awan "wiped clean" a cellphone he was found with when he was arrested at Dulles International Airport in July. According to Mirando, the phone was wiped "just a few hours before" his arrest.

Awan's attorney, Chris Gowen, then told the judge, "Awan had recently bought the phone, so of course it didn’t have any data on it."

In response, Mirando revealed that the FBI discovered the phone was wiped on purpose. A time stamp on the Apple iPhone indicated that it had been wiped at 6:30 p.m. that evening, just a little over three hours before his arrest.

The phone has a feature that allows consumers to "wipe" its contents and revert it to its default, factory settings. FBI investigators could tell when the phone was wiped because it created a "dot obliterated" file with a time stamp at that time.

In another twist during the hearing, Gowen brought up the computer that US Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz tried to get removed from the Capitol Police's evidence file and returned to her by publicly threatening the police chief during an annual budget hearing for the department.

Wasserman Schultz told the police chief there would be unnamed "consequences" if she didn’t get the computer back.

Astoundingly, Gowen made the case that the computer was "protected by attorney-client privilege" because it was left in a public phone booth with a note that said "attorney client privilege."

IVP Donate

Rep. Wasserman Schultz has come under fire for her close relationship with Awan.

"For several months, Wasserman Schultz refused to remove Awan from house payroll even though he was barred from the House computer system which would presumably prevent him from performing any reasonable IT work," Matthew G. Whitaker, executive director of the right-leaning Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT), wrote in a letter last summer to Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) Chairman Doc Hastings.

Whitaker called it "contrary to the House Ethics Rules for Wasserman Schultz to continue to pay Awan with taxpayer funds even after he was barred from the House computer system and could not perform his duties, and was also under criminal investigation."

Latest articles

Wall St. sign.
Americans Want Congress to Stop Playing the Market — So Why Won’t Lawmakers Listen?
Americans have spoken, again and again — and the message is crystal clear: members of Congress should not be allowed to trade stocks while in office. Yet, despite bipartisan legislative proposals and national scrutiny, Congress continues to stall....
05 Aug, 2025
-
3 min read
stacks of cash.
From Relief to Rage: $100M FireAid Concert Engulfed in Political Scandal
LOS ANGELES, CA – It seems we can’t even have a $100 million benefit concert without inviting partis...
05 Aug, 2025
-
10 min read
One hand holding a blue California and another holding a red Texas in front of the US Capitol Building.
The Redistricting War Is Here — One CA Republican Says It’s Time to Call It Off
Texas Republicans have threatened to redraw their maps to protect their party’s majority in Congress. California Democrats have, in turn, threatened to respond with their own mid-decade redistricting to “fight fire with fire.”...
05 Aug, 2025
-
4 min read