ACLU: California Tossing Ballots over Sloppy Signatures

ACLU: California Tossing Ballots over Sloppy Signatures
Published: 02 Oct, 2017
2 min read

How often do you think about your signature? Probably not often. It becomes so routine that it is a matter of muscle memory for most people.

However, the LA Times reports that with the rise in absentee ballots cast, not having a neat, consistent signature that matches your voter registration card or your diver's license may be enough to get your ballot tossed -- meaning your vote won't count.

The Times reports:

"The reality is that current California law is so flexible as to be vague when it comes to what an elections official should do when faced with an absentee voter’s sloppy signature. It simply states that the ballot counts if the official “determines that the signatures compare.”

State law, argues a lawsuit filed in August by the ACLU of Northern California, doesn’t say “how elections officials should make this determination” or require “training in handwriting identification or comparison.” The case is centered on a Sonoma County voter whose ballot was rejected because of his signature. It argues his constitutional right to equal protection was violated because no one allowed him to fix the signature problem."

ACLU states in the aforementioned lawsuit that 45,000 ballots were discarded in November 2016 "with mismatched signatures cited as the reason."

Imagine a 50-year-old man or woman who last signed their voter registration card when they were 18, but now have a different signature. Election officials admit they have no guide to handle that.

The situation might get tricker as counties move to strictly vote-by-mail. State law allows 14 counties to move to mostly all-mailed voting in 2018, while the rest of California will be allowed to make those changes in 2020.

If a signature on a mail-in ballot doesn't match the signature the county has on file, the county then has to track down that person, if they take that step at all.

IVP Donate

Each county has the discretion to handle this however they deem appropriate.

Read the full story here.

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read