Appeal in Johnson and Stein's Debate Lawsuit Could Reach SCOTUS

image
Published: 06 Sep, 2017
2 min read

September 6, 2017, Salt Lake City, UT -- Pledging to take the fight to the Supreme Court if necessary, officials with the Our America Initiative plan to appeal an August 29 decision by the federal D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold an earlier dismissal of Johnson v. Commission on Presidential Debates.

The lawsuit challenges the Commission on Presidential Debates and its exclusion of qualified candidates other than the Republican and Democratic presidential and vice-presidential nominees.

ALSO READ: Johnson, Stein Lose Debate Lawsuit, but the Fight Is Far From Over

The lawsuit, filed by former Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson, Green Party candidate Jill Stein and others, and supported by the nonprofit Our America Initiative, contends that the private Commission on Presidential Debates represents an unfair and illegal monopoly that gives partisan advantage to the Republican and Democratic national parties and their nominees.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs, led by Bruce Fein, plan to file a Petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc by September 28, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. If that petition is denied, Our America’s legal team plans to file a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the Supreme Court.

Announcing the planned appeal, Our America Honorary Board Member Jim Gray said:

“We have never expected this to be a quick or easy fight. The two so-called major parties have succeeded in making the private, partisan Commission on Presidential Debates so entrenched that dislodging their control is extremely difficult.

“However, the stakes are simply too high to do anything less than pursue every legal option we have in order to not only win the legal battle, but to continue to strip away the veneer covering what is a clearly rigged debate process. 

"To change policies in America, we must change the politics. And to change the politics, we must give voters real choices. Making the debates fair and open to all qualified candidates is critical to providing those choices.”

IVP Donate

Editor's note: This press release originally published on Our America Initiative's website, and has been modified slightly for publication on IVN.

Photo Credit: Bill Clark/CQPHO

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read