Colorado Ethics Watch: $1.9 Million Unaccounted for During 2016 Campaigns

image
Published: 27 Jul, 2017
2 min read

Rising distrust in our political system is due in large part to a lack of transparency in several aspects of government.

In Colorado, several organizations have taken up the cause of increasing transparency. Colorado Ethics Watch, a nonpartisan nonprofit, has been working for over 10 years in keeping the government accountable to the people it represents through government ethics work and attempting to decrease the influence of money in politics.

Colorado Ethics Watch conducted a study last year that showed $1.9 million was spent on campaigns in Colorado between the 2016 primary and the date at which funds spent on advertising must be disclosed.

They called this the “disclosure gap,” as the sources of the funds spent during this period remain unknown to the public.

Currently, Colorado Ethics Watch is working with Colorado Common Cause and Denver City officials to draft legislation to modernize the city campaign finance code that would introduce more full and frequent disclosure requirements for candidates, PACs, and other outside groups in municipal elections.

The group is drafting a measure that will be introduced as an ordinance to be passed through city council at the end of the summer.

Peg Perl, senior counsel for Colorado Ethics Watch, pointed out that an increase in outside spending on candidates’ campaigns has led to a need to update Denver’s finance laws, which were written in the 1990s.

In regard to how they plan to update the laws, Perl said:

“We are looking at a comprehensive modernization of the laws to increase public disclosure by city candidates, PACs and other outside groups, as well as practical issues like making campaign information easier for voters to find and digest.”

IVP Donate

Author's note: The article has been updated to reflect the fact that Colorado Ethics Watchdog is not a part of the Unrig the System coalition as the original publication suggested.

 

Photo Credit: Twinsterphoto / shutterstock.com

You Might Also Like

Caution tape with US Capitol building in the background.
Did the Republicans or Democrats Start the Gerrymandering Fight?
The 2026 midterm election cycle is quickly approaching. However, there is a lingering question mark over what congressional maps will look like when voters start to cast their ballots, especially as Republicans and Democrats fight to obtain any electoral advantage possible. ...
11 Nov, 2025
-
8 min read
Utah state capitol.
Utah Judge Delivers a Major Blow to Gerrymandering
A Utah state judge has struck down the congressional map drawn by Republican lawmakers, ruling that it violates the state’s voter-approved ban on partisan gerrymandering and ordering new district lines for the 2026 elections....
11 Nov, 2025
-
2 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read