Rand Paul: "They Want to Send Your Kids to War with No Debate"

image
Published: 28 Mar, 2017
Updated: 17 Oct, 2022
2 min read

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1zdvSsLBvM

On Monday, the Senate approved in a near unanimous vote to clear the way for Montenegro to be the latest entry into NATO. The vote does not officially add the Balkan country, but it does approve a final vote later this week.

The Senate vote in favor was 97-2. The two dissenting votes were U.S. Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah).

In case you are not sure where Montenegro is, here is a map:

Supporters believe the move will send a strong message to Russia, a country that has been at the forefront of American political discourse as the FBI and Congress investigate Russia's alleged involvement in the 2016 presidential election and ties to President Donald Trump.

This is part of the reason Sen. Paul believes now is not the time to add a former Russian ally that just elected a pro-EU government in a volatile geopolitical region to NATO.

"Montenegro in NATO will antagonize Russia while doing nothing to advance US national security," he said.

While adding Montenegro to NATO has various implications, one of the most significant is that the U.S. would be partly responsible for the nation's defense should it come under attack.

IVP Donate

Rand Paul echoed President Trump's concerns that the U.S. spends a disproportionate amount of money, resources, and in Paul's words, "blood," on NATO.

https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/846471452694138884

Paul proposed an amendment that required the Senate to debate and vote on a formal declaration of war before sending troops to Montenegro should the country be attacked, even if it officially becomes a member of NATO.

https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/846472923426762752

“The people here who are these mouthpieces for war,” Paul remarked, “who think every soldier wants to go to war, go out and meet the soldiers and ask them whether they want the civilian senators to debate and have a formal declaration of war.”

Is Rand Paul right about this issue? Do Republicans and Democrats commit our troops to war too lightly? Do we need more debate in our foreign policy, and more diverse debate? What do you think?

Latest articles

A person filling out a voting form with people voting in the background.
The ‘2% Democracy’: New Jersey Primary Elections Need Complete Systemic Overhaul
New Jersey will hold its statewide primary elections on Tuesday, June 10, to determine who will appear in the general election for the highest offices in the state, including governor. These are important elections – and yet they will be decided by a marginal percentage of voters....
09 Jun, 2025
-
4 min read
Boston Massachusetts
Boston, Concord Want Ranked Choice Voting -- Here's Why State Law Makes It Difficult
Concord is the latest town in Massachusetts to signal it wants to adopt ranked choice voting after residents overwhelmingly voted for Article 28 in a town meeting Wednesday. The vote comes not long after the Boston City Council advanced its own ranked choice voting measure....
09 Jun, 2025
-
4 min read
An electric sign of the American flag.
ABC's Sara Haines Calls Out 'Narrow View' that Independent Voters Can't Exist in Trump Era
American journalist and co-host of ABC’s The View, Sara Haines, refutes the notion that people can't be independent-minded in their election choices in an era in which the Republican Party is controlled by Trump – a perspective voiced by her colleague, Sunny Houstin that Haines describes as “narrow.”...
06 Jun, 2025
-
3 min read