Debate Commission Quietly Swapped Co-Chairs and No One Noticed

image
Author: Nick Bolelli
Published: 27 Mar, 2017
Updated: 17 Oct, 2022
2 min read

Outside the fall presidential debates, there are a lot of people who don't know about the Commission on Presidential Debates, mostly because it keeps its internal matters quiet. For instance, few noticed that the CPD swapped co-chairs in January, with Michael D. McCurry being replaced by Dorothy S. Ridings. Even McCurry's Wikipedia page still says he co-chairs the debate commission.

Screenshot taken on 3/26/17.

As previously reported on IVN, McCurry is most known as President Bill Clinton's press secretary, though he did serve on the Democratic National Committee before that. Ridings, who was already a member of the debate commission, is a former president of the League of Women Voters (from 1982-1986), right before the League walked away from presidential debates.

(Click here for the full list of the Commission Leadership)

Before the Commission on Presidential Debates took over the debates, the League of Women Voters was the primary sponsor of them, dating back to 1976. However, the parties wanted a greater say in how the debates were conducted, and thus in 1985 signed an agreement to become primary sponsors.

According to a 1985 article in the New York Times, the League criticized the parties' efforts to take over the debates, including Ridings, who questioned how third party and independent candidates would fare under Republican and Democratic sponsorship.

Thus, in 1987 the Commission on Presidential Debates was formed, created by party chairs Frank J. Fahrenkopf, Jr, (Republican, still a co-chair) and Paul G. Kirk, Jr (Democrat).

The League remained on as a co-sponsor of the fall debates until the next presidential election in 1988. In October 1988, the League withdrew its sponsorship because the organization believed "the demands of the two campaign organizations would perpetrate a fraud on the American voter."

Though the debate commission is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, its operations have largely been controlled by people loyal to the Republican and Democratic Parties -- a bipartisan effort. Ethical questions have even surfaced over the extent of this loyalty. McCurry, for instance, gave money to Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign while a co-chair of the CPD. Fahrenkopf also has a long history of campaign and party donations.

What the co-chair swap means for the future of the debate commission is currently unknown. The CPD already reportedly lost a third of its members while it was the subject of two lawsuits filed against it and the FEC. A federal judge ruled in favor of Peter Ackerman and Level the Playing Field, the plaintiffs in the lawsuit filed against the FEC, who are challenging the CPD's rules that determine which candidates make it on the debate stage.

IVP Donate

Read More Coverage on Level the Playing Field's Lawsuit

Check out the Independent Voter Project's amicus brief in Level the Playing Field, et. al. v. FEC

The other case, an anti-trust lawsuit filed by Gov. Gary Johnson, Dr. Jill Stein, their respective parties, and affiliated groups, will get another day in court on April 21 before the D.C. Court of Appeals. This may be the beginning of dramatic change to how the Commission on Presidential Debates functions and operates.

 

Latest articles

Elon Musk
Musk vs The Duopoly: Will the America Party Succeed Where Others Have Failed?
Elon Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla, SpaceX, and X, and former Director of the Department of Government Efficiency, has officially launched the America Party, framing it as a challenge to what he calls a “one-party system” dominated by wasteful government spending....
07 Jul, 2025
-
5 min read
CA capitol building dome with flags.
Why is CA Senator Mike McGuire Trying to Kill the Legal Cannabis Industry?
California’s legal cannabis industry is under mounting pressure, and in early June, state lawmakers and the governor appeared poised to help. A bill to freeze the state’s cannabis excise tax at 15% sailed through the State Assembly with a unanimous 74-0 vote. The governor’s office backed the plan. And legal cannabis businesses, still struggling to compete with unregulated sellers and mounting operating costs, saw a glimmer of hope....
03 Jul, 2025
-
7 min read
I voted buttons
After First RCV Election, Charlottesville Voters Back the Reform: 'They Get It, They Like It, They Want to Do It Again'
A new survey out of Charlottesville, Virginia, shows overwhelming support for ranked choice voting (RCV) following the city’s first use of the system in its June Democratic primary for City Council. Conducted one week after the election, the results found that nearly 90% of respondents support continued use of RCV....
03 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read