District of Columbia: Where The Feds Will Take Your Money But Won't Give You Representation

image
Ryan SwanzeyRyan Swanzey
Published: 26 Jun, 2015
2 min read

In the United States, every citizen over the age of 18 has the right to vote a congressman or congresswoman into office to represent the interests of his or her district -- except for roughly 650,000 citizens who have the misfortune of living within a 100 square mile grid surrounding the nation’s capitol.

Although the city of Washington, D.C. has a congresswoman -- U.S. Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton -- she is a non-voting delegate. Unlike territories like Guam or Puerto Rico that also have a non-voting representative, the citizens of Washington pay approximately $4 billion in federal taxes annually. Citizens pay an average of $6,500 per year, or twice the national average. They are being taxed without representation. This was a cause of the Revolutionary War.

There wasn’t even a local government until the Home Rule Act was passed on Christmas Eve in 1973, allowing for the citizens to elect a mayor and city council. Even so, they lack the typical checks offered by the institutions of local and state governance with the capitol just a short walk down the road.

Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution grants Congress the power to govern the District of Columbia. While some argue that making DC the 51st state would finally treat the people who live there as equal citizens, that would surely require a constitutional amendment. If legislation were the next best alternative, there would be no means for citizens of Washington, D.C. to also be represented in the U.S. Senate, just like every other US citizen.

Past efforts to address this issue have fallen short. The D.C. Voting Rights Act of 2007 passed the House of Representatives by a substantial 241-177 majority, only to be blocked from a vote by the Senate. The D.C. House Voting Rights Act of 2009 similarly passed the Senate by a 61-37 margin, but it was never taken up by the House.

The District of Columbia has a population greater than the cities of Baltimore and Boston, or the states of Vermont and Wyoming. What would be the reaction if an executive order were issued tomorrow revoking the voting power of the representatives elected to serve those areas? Every American should have full representation in Congress, not just democracy in name only.

You Might Also Like

Ethan Penner
Could This Well-Funded Independent Upend the CA Governor’s Race?
Ethan Penner, a Calabasas businessman, author, and educator with a storied career in real estate finance, has officially announced his intention to run for California governor in 2026 as an independent. On his campaign website, Penner says he is running to “disrupt the failing two-party system.” ...
12 Sep, 2025
-
5 min read
Supreme Court of the United States
Forward Party Joins Petition to SCOTUS Against State of Florida
Right now, the divide between the Republican and Democratic Parties appears beyond repair. The political rhetoric is toxic, the nation’s leadership puts party gain before lasting solutions, and few voters actually feel heard by the people elected to represent them. At a time when it seems things will only get worse from here, the Independent Voter Project filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court along with Open Primaries and the Forward Party in support of a lawsuit that targets one of the biggest culprits behind all of this....
16 Sep, 2025
-
3 min read
congress flag
Poll: 82% of Americans Want Redistricting Done by Independent Commission, Not Politicians
There may be no greater indication that voters are not being listened to in the escalating redistricting war between the Republican and Democratic Parties than a new poll from NBC News that shows 8-in-10 Americans want the parties to stop....
10 Sep, 2025
-
3 min read