New Jersey Spends Nearly $100 Per Voter in 2013 Primary Elections

image
Published: 19 Nov, 2013
2 min read
Much has been made of the cost of New Jersey’s special senatorial election this past year, which saw Cory Booker elected to replace Frank Lautenberg as the Garden State's second representative to the Senate.

Super No Funding Time_ad2

Montclair Deputy Mayor Bob Russo was just one politician among many from both the Democratic and Republican parties to call the elections a “complete waste of taxpayer money."

In Chris Christie’s attempt to keep a galvanized Democratic base away from his own re-election bid, he scheduled a primary election in August and the actual election in October, a mere three weeks before the gubernatorial election day. The cost to voters of the state equaled almost $24 million; $12 million for the primary election and $12 million for the general.

The National Journal found that the costs break down as follows:

  • $5.4 million: The approximate cost for poll workers' salaries per election. This number is based on the 6,542 polling places in 2013, the minimum number of workers per polling place (four), and the $200 salary for poll workers. The cost would be divided between the counties and the state.
  • $6.5 million: The approximate cost for "ballot printing and postage, processing, legal advertising, polling-place rental, and voting-machine delivery" per special election.

In addition to the astronomical cost in the midst of budgetary struggles, the voter turnout was one of the lowest in history.

In the 2013 primary election for example, there was only a 9 percent voter turnout of eligible voters -- 130,340 voters. The cost, therefore, per participant in the primaries alone was over $92.

Presidential election years typically see upwards of half a million voters cast their ballots in primaries. House and Senate campaigns reach anywhere between 300,000 – 400,000 voters on average during mid-term elections, making the cost up to $50 per participant over the past 15 years.

This year's special election was therefore not only one of the lowest in terms of citizen participation, but also one of the highest in terms of expense.

chart

IVP Donate

Editor's Note: State offices in New Jersey were contacted about the cost of elections and a Freedom of Information Act request was filed. The state was not able to provide specific data on the cost of past elections. The spending figures for past elections are an estimate based on 2013 data.

Photo Credit: spirit of America / shutterstock.com

You Might Also Like

“Cartoon illustration of Americans facing the U.S. Capitol as light pierces through red and blue partisan cracks, representing independent voters and hope for political reform.”
New Poll: Voters Want New Leadership – and They’re Turning to Independents
A new poll from the Independent Center highlights a clear message from the public: Americans are fed up with the current political leadership, and they’re ready for change....
12 Nov, 2025
-
2 min read
Massachusetts voters.
Ranked Choice Voting Momentum Surges in Massachusetts as Cities Push for Local Control
Ranked choice voting (RCV) continues to see a surge in momentum across the U.S. However, the state that has seen the largest reform growth in the last 5 years -- Massachusetts -- has received little attention. This is because the 10 cities that have approved RCV have not been able to implement it due to state law....
14 Nov, 2025
-
5 min read
Caution tape with US Capitol building in the background.
Did the Republicans or Democrats Start the Gerrymandering Fight?
The 2026 midterm election cycle is quickly approaching. However, there is a lingering question mark over what congressional maps will look like when voters start to cast their ballots, especially as Republicans and Democrats fight to obtain any electoral advantage possible. ...
11 Nov, 2025
-
8 min read