logo

New Jersey Spends Nearly $100 Per Voter in 2013 Primary Elections

image
Created: 19 November, 2013
Updated: 14 October, 2022
2 min read
Much has been made of the cost of New Jersey’s special senatorial election this past year, which saw Cory Booker elected to replace Frank Lautenberg as the Garden State's second representative to the Senate.

Super No Funding Time_ad2

Montclair Deputy Mayor Bob Russo was just one politician among many from both the Democratic and Republican parties to call the elections a “complete waste of taxpayer money."

In Chris Christie’s attempt to keep a galvanized Democratic base away from his own re-election bid, he scheduled a primary election in August and the actual election in October, a mere three weeks before the gubernatorial election day. The cost to voters of the state equaled almost $24 million; $12 million for the primary election and $12 million for the general.

The National Journal found that the costs break down as follows:

  • $5.4 million: The approximate cost for poll workers' salaries per election. This number is based on the 6,542 polling places in 2013, the minimum number of workers per polling place (four), and the $200 salary for poll workers. The cost would be divided between the counties and the state.
  • $6.5 million: The approximate cost for "ballot printing and postage, processing, legal advertising, polling-place rental, and voting-machine delivery" per special election.

In addition to the astronomical cost in the midst of budgetary struggles, the voter turnout was one of the lowest in history.

In the 2013 primary election for example, there was only a 9 percent voter turnout of eligible voters -- 130,340 voters. The cost, therefore, per participant in the primaries alone was over $92.

Presidential election years typically see upwards of half a million voters cast their ballots in primaries. House and Senate campaigns reach anywhere between 300,000 – 400,000 voters on average during mid-term elections, making the cost up to $50 per participant over the past 15 years.

This year's special election was therefore not only one of the lowest in terms of citizen participation, but also one of the highest in terms of expense.

chart

More Choice for San Diego

Editor's Note: State offices in New Jersey were contacted about the cost of elections and a Freedom of Information Act request was filed. The state was not able to provide specific data on the cost of past elections. The spending figures for past elections are an estimate based on 2013 data.

Photo Credit: spirit of America / shutterstock.com

Latest articles

ballot
Independent Voters Have Yet to Fully Flex Their Influence in Presidential Elections
Exit polling from Edison Research shows that self-identified independents made up a larger share of the 2024 vote -- but with independent ID reaching a majority of the electorate, this bloc has yet to fully make its presence felt in presidential elections....
07 November, 2024
-
2 min read
Trump
Do Presidential Elections Really Matter?
In October 2012, I published an op-ed in the Huffington Post asking, “Do Presidential Elections Really Matter?” In May 2023 I wrote a similar column in The Fulcrum asking the question once again....
07 November, 2024
-
4 min read
two parties
The Parties Strike Back: Deceptive Tactics Lead to Rough Night for More Choice Elections
Voters across the US had a chance to change the political landscape in the country forever. In 2024, however, the two major parties were mostly successful at stopping reform to the electoral status quo....
06 November, 2024
-
5 min read