NSA Violated Constitution by Breaching Tens of Thousands of American Emails

image
Brian IniguezBrian Iniguez
Published: 22 Aug, 2013
2 min read
National trust in the NSA could further deplete in the wake of a 2011 

court ruling released Wednesday. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) chief justice Judge John D. Bates declared the methods undertaken by the agency unconstitutional and overreaching in authority.

The NSA is purported to have gathered and stored thousands of communications belonging to American citizens, a stark difference to what the secret court had been led to believe in both scope and nature. Bates had not been aware the extent to which the agency had intervened in civil life.

The document outlining the court's decision also reveals the NSA's records of breaching its own surveillance protocol annually, with tens of thousands of Americans' emails being "gathered" along with foreign intel.

Some argue that these are merely statistically inevitable mistakes and not an abuse of authority. Others call for a discontinuation of the agency altogether, crying Big Brother. The NSA is claiming they're doing this for national security. So, how well have they performed?

Director General Keith Alexander gave a very telling speech at the Black Hat computer-security conference:

"I promise you the truth -- what we know, what we're doing, and what I cannot tell you because we don't want to jeopardize our future defense."

Alexander also revealed two important numbers, validating his agency's existence. Fifty-four terrorist attacks, according to Alexander, have been prevented worldwide. Thirteen of them were based in the U.S.

The specifics of the thwarted attacks were left unsaid.

Despite its unpopularity, the NSA claims to track only about .00004 percent of all web traffic, an extremely small amount considering the scale of everyday networking. How does an agency that only looks at one part per million of the Internet accidentally store citizens' information?

Alexander provides:

IVP Donate

"A US person might be courtesy copied on an e-mail to or from a legitimate foreign target, or a person in the US might be in contact with a known terrorist target."

Considering the questionable cases surrounding Internet arrests, these mistakes could end up costing someone their livelihood.

Americans finding out that a court ruled the NSA's methods unconstitutional two years later will further sour the relationship between the people and their government.

Photo Credit: Credit: amaze646 / Shutterstock.com

You Might Also Like

Proposition 50 voter guide
California Prop 50: Partisan Power Play or Necessary Counterpunch?
November 4 marks a special election for what has become the most controversial ballot measure in California in recent memory: Proposition 50, which would circumvent congressional districts drawn by the state’s independent redistricting commission for a legislative-drawn map....
01 Oct, 2025
-
9 min read
court gavel.
Virtual Discussion: The Fight for Equal Independent Voting Rights Makes it to SCOTUS
Every major voting rights movement in U.S. history – whether successful or not – has intertwined with landmark litigation. This was the case for women’s suffrage. It was the case for civil rights. And it is the case in the ongoing effort to protect the right of all voters to have equal participation in taxpayer-funded elections – something millions of independent voters are denied across the U.S....
29 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read
Supreme Court building
SCOTUS Considers Challenge to Closed Primaries -- Here's Why It Is Such a Big Deal
In a dramatic step forward for litigation challenging closed primaries, the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated they are going to conference to discuss whether to grant a writ of certiorari to Polelle v. Florida Secretary of State; a case challenging Florida's closed primaries that Open Primaries has supported since its inception....
26 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read