New Jersey Taxpayers Pay $12 Million for a Primary They Won't Vote In

image
Published: 10 Jun, 2013
2 min read

Governor Chris Christie announced that New Jersey will hold special elections in October to fill the seat left vacant after the death of Senator Frank Lautenberg. The cost of this decision has already become controversial, including the $12 million spent on a partisan primary, nobody will vote in.

To fill the vacancy, two solutions exist: nominate someone to fill in until the normally scheduled 2014 elections or organize a special election. Governor Christie chose the latter. This choice and its price tag is already receiving a lot of heat, but the focus is not where it needs to be.

New Jersey already had the elections for the governor and the state legislators scheduled for November. But Christie chose to set the date of the special election 3 weeks earlier on October 16.

“This is about guaranteeing the people of New Jersey both a choice and a voice in the process,” said Chris Christie to justify his decision.

The irony behind this declaration is that nearly half of the state's registered voters are being held back from fully participating in the electoral system. And, they will still have to pay a multi-million dollar bill.

Organizing the special elections will cost an estimated $24 million of the taxpayer's money, $12 million for the primary and $12 million for the October election. Critics have already come forward with a list of programs the governor could have restored with that money instead of spending it on the elections. Nobody has, however, raised the issue of how half of the cost of this election will be wasted on partisan primaries nobody will vote in.

New Jersey, like 19 other states, has a closed primary system meaning that only voters affiliated with a party may vote in its primary. However, according to the last voter registration, nonaffiliated voters now make up more than 47 percent of all registered voters in the state, far above the 32 percent of Democrats and 22 percent of Republicans.

The closed primary system discriminates against unaffiliated voters by making it harder for them to vote in the primary. They are allowed to vote in one of the primaries on the condition that they register with that party on election day. They will have to then re-register to regain their unaffiliated status.

This cumbersome process is not only discriminatory against nearly half of New Jersey's registered voters, but results in very low voter participation. The 2012 June primary had a 8.8 percent voter turnout, one of the lowest in the country. This number will be even lower for this election as the combination of a special election's primary set in the middle of the summer is the perfect recipe to have the least number of New Jerseyans participating.

IVP Donate

The New Jersey partisan primaries are designed to provide parties with the opportunity to select their champion for the final battle set in the general elections. Since half of the state's voters decide not to be affiliated with the parties and do not participate, continuing to spend millions of taxpayer dollars on them should be reconsidered.

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read